Skip to main content

Dead pool: Will Canon EOS M, Micro Four Thirds, Hasselblad XCD + Pentax K really be dead by 2025?

Dead pool: Canon M, Micro Four Thirds, Hasselblad XCD + Pentax K dead by 2025?
(Image credit: YouTube: Tony & Chelsea Northrup)

We all know that it's been a rough couple of years for the camera industry, and the current COVID-19 pandemic clearly hasn't helped matters. However, according to one noted photography pundit, things are so bad that no fewer than four different camera systems will be dead within three to five years.

Photographer and YouTuber Tony Northrup posted a new video predicting that the Canon EOS M, Hasselblad XCD, Micro Four Thirds, Pentax K camera systems will be phased out due to the commercial realities of the industry as it stands.

He also identifies four other systems as being at risk of being phased out: Fujifilm GFX, L-Mount (which comprises Panasonic's entire full-frame line, the Sigma FP and a number of new Leica bodies), and Canon EF and Nikon F DSLRs. 

So, is Northrup right? Are the former camera systems really going to die by 2025, are those companies going to close, and should you abandon ship right now? Well, clearly nobody can predict the future – including Northrup, who last declared incorrectly that "Micro Four Thirds is DEAD!" in 2018 –  but here's our take on how things look for the camera systems on this dead pool… 

Canon EOS M

Tony is hardly alone in wondering where Canon's APS-C mirrorless system sits, given its apparently limited lens lineup and the system's overall insularity. In particular, when the RF mount was revealed and it was completely incompatible with the M system, many wondered if Canon was set to abandon its smaller system.

However, despite the notion that there aren't many lenses for it, the EOS M mount is surprisingly mature – there were 31 Canon EOS M lenses when the EOS M6 Mark II was launched last summer, and there have been more released since then including such brilliant optics as the Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO, plus three models from Sigma including the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN | C

Canon told us last year that "the M series is here to stay," and while cameras such as the Canon EOS M50 might seem like oddities in the United States, it should be remembered that it has consistently been one of the best-selling cameras in Asia. This is where Northrup's claims are a little Western-centric, if not parochial, as the popularity of the EOS M line in that part of the world might be enough to keep the line alive on their own – regardless of their continued adoption in the US. 

With brilliant bodies like the Canon EOS M6 Mark II (which in many ways is superior to its DSLR counterpart, the Canon EOS 90D), and bountiful rumors about more M-system cameras this year, if the EOS M system is in its death throes then Canon doesn't seem to have had the memo! 

The best Canon EOS-M lenses in 2020

Hasselblad XCD

Hasselblad X1D II 50C (review) (Image credit: James Artaius / Digital Camera World)

One of Northrup's observations is that, while companies rarely tell consumers that a system is being phased out (the Samsung NX being the oft-cited example), a telltale sign that a camera line is on the wane is that the latest models are often little more than software revisions, with little or nothing in the way of internal or external hardware upgrades.  

Hasselblad's mirrorless medium format system certainly falls into this category, with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C's main improvement over its predecessor being that it boots up and processes images faster. Indeed, the new camera was such a rush job that its video features didn't even work. And, with its most notable feature being its low (for medium format) price tag of $5,750 / £5,400, many saw it as Hasselblad trying to claw back sales by competing on price.

With the Fujifilm GFX line now dominating the mirrorless medium format space, with more affordable optics that are just as capable, it's difficult to see where the XCD system realistically fits in a shrinking sales space. And while Hasselblad had been positioning the line as a Leica-like prestige brand, the new lower pricing strategy seems to preclude it from achieving that perception as well (although this change may be linked to Hasselblad now being owned by DJI). 

Micro Four Thirds

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III (review) (Image credit: James Artaius)

As noted, Northrup has previously soothsaid that Micro Four Thirds is dead – indeed, experts and naysayers have been saying that for years. So what truth is there to the idea that the smallest interchangeable lens system on the market is going to be dead in five years? 

Clearly there were rumors last year that Olympus was selling its camera business, though these have been debunked for now. And the fact that Panasonic jumped into bed with Leica and Sigma to produce full-frame cameras was a pretty clear indication that its focus was no longer on Micro Four Thirds technology. 

Northrup cites that the smaller sensors of Olympus and Panasonic cameras make them more susceptible to sales erosion from the best camera phones, though the fact is that phones are eating into sales of every camera system regardless of what sensor is inside. And again, the argument rather overlooks the fact that Olympus cameras – particularly the PEN line, like the Olympus PEN E-PL10 – are consistently among the best-selling cameras across Asia. 

An often overlooked factor is that Micro Four Thirds is an open platform, meaning that anyone can develop for it without having to license the technology (which is what has limited third-party support for the Fujifilm X system). This, combined with the smaller system being cheaper to develop for and manufacture, means that it has an incredible amount of support from producers of lenses as well as cameras. 

So, while Northrup notes that Olympus alone can't keep the shop afloat, that overlooks the Sharp 8K Video Camera, the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K, the newly announced Z CAM E2-M4 4K cine camera and others who are taking Micro Four Thirds into the filmmaking realm – where it is a formidable system for guerrilla, independent and entry level cinematographers. 

In short, there seems to be plenty of life left in the Micro Four Thirds system. 

The best Micro Four Thirds lenses in 2020

Pentax K

Pentax KP (review) (Image credit: Pentax/Adorama)

We've always had a soft spot for the legendary brand, but being optimistic about the future of the Pentax K system is increasingly challenging. Third-party lens support is crucial for the vitality of most mounts, so it's a big red flag when a major optics manufacturer announces that it is abandoning a camera system – as Sigma did, when it revealed that it ending Pentax K lens production

It doesn't feel like the lens support is any greater from the company itself, with its latest HD Pentax-D FA★85mm F1.4ED SDM AW providing little comfort for Pentax K users thirsty for a new optic for their system.  

It doesn't help confidence that Ricoh Imaging – current licensor of the Pentax brand – steadfastly refuses to move with the times and embrace mirrorless technology, insisting that mirrorless users will "come back to the DSLR". Echoing this archaic sentiment, the upcoming Pentax flagship DSLR feels like a camera out of time – and its only standout feature seems to be a larger optical viewfinder. 

We definitely don't want to see the K system go away but, unless Ricoh does some serious course correction, Northrup may be sadly on the money. 

The best Pentax lenses in 2020

Read more: 

The best Canon camera: Canon's DSLR, mirrorless and compact cameras
The best Olympus camera: for Instagrammers, enthusiasts and pros
The best Pentax cameras: from APS-C to full frame and medium format

  • Tord S Eriksson
    I thought Pentax would die a long time ago, so I jumped ship, but after having changed owners several times the Pentax brand has stayed on, and nowadays their cameras are pretty much up to date. And new lenses have been appearing, slowly but surely.

    If Panasonic abandons m43 the writing is on the wall for the other m43 manufacturers, no doubt, but having such good cameras, and lenses, they seem well adjusted to the needs of the customers.

    I know a handful of E-M1X users (pros and enthusiasts) and they all come from Canon 1Dx (as far as I know) and have never been happier with a new camera system, as they get a more capable camera system for a fraction of the weight (and less cost).

    The sad thing is that the two big m43 players don't cooperate, so there is no way an Olympus lens with an anti-shake system can be used with a Panasonic camera with IBIS, with the two systems cooperating, as they do when the same brand of camera and lens are used together (both make lenses with anti-shake and both make cameras with IBIS).

    That is, to me, idiotic, no more, no less.

    Nikon 1 died due to the crappiest lenses ever made (not optically, but mechanically). The cameras work very well with F Mount lenses, so I am sure they will be around for at least a decade more! For me personally, they replace the use of TCs and the resulting image results are better than using TCs, definitely. due to some board decision, the FT-1 adapter dumbs down the AF of your Nikon 1 camera, but that is really the only major problem using the F Mount lenses.

    My 150-600 becomes a 405-1,620mm lens with excellent image quality, something impossible with a TC.

    My 135/1.8 becomes a 365/1.8 lens, still as sharp as a needle!

    Good day, all!
  • Will Parkin
    Two corrections and one observation

    1) Pentax have announced the release of 3 new lenses not 1, not really a sign of lack of commitment . Pentax users are well served with lens choices, the K mount gives compatibility to a wide range of excellent legacy glass as well as a huge amount more via adaptors, that is one of its core strengths. A Pentax user will never be short of superb glass.
    2) The only thing Pentax has clearly announced about the new Flagship camera is the larger viewfinder, it does not follow that there will not be further innovations as they are renowned for it, Astro tracer and being at the forefront with pixel shift are examples. They have hinted at dramatic improvements in autofocus and I still hold out hopes for a hybrid viewfinder , something that which would really turn some heads. We must not conclude what their next camera will be until it is released, then we can judge it on its merits.

    Observation, Tony Northrop does not reference the profitability of the various companies in his analysis, (Canon Imaging System -80.6%, Olympus imaging +77.9% (still have loss but much less), Nikon Imaging Products Business -23.7%, Fujifilm Imaging system -51.0%, Ricoh Imaging -1.7%), a key factor in survival , in that respect my understanding would be that Pentax is holding up well in comparison. Pentax seem to have rationalised their range of cameras, while some of the larger players in the market, as of yet, have not. It is also difficult for a large company to transition to operating in a shrinking market, more so than for one that is small.

    I think it is unwise to place much credence in this Youtubers video given its limited factual content and inaccuracies, (he has the Pentax 645 mount listed as a dead mount, which it is not), when compared with his biased, unsupported opinion. The fact is all camera companies are struggling in this market, singling out one or two does not help the industry as a whole or represent the views of those who support the endevour of taking photographs