Best budget prime lens: 8 top portraiture optics tested and rated

Best budget prime lens: 8 top optics tested and rated

A standard kit zoom lens can work reasonably well for portraiture, but a budget prime lens gives you greater versatility. We tested eight of the top options to see how they performed.

Best budget prime lens: 8 top optics tested and rated

Best budget prime lens: The Contenders

  • Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, £305
  • Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, £305
  • Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, £290
  • Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8G, £380
  • Samyang 85mm f/1.4 IF MC, £320
  • Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM, £380
  • Sigma 70mm f/2.8 Macro EX DG, £370
  • Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro, £370

SEE MORE: 9 things you should know before using prime lenses

You can’t often say that a prime lens gives more versatility than a zoom for a certain type of shot, but portraiture is something of a special case.

The main concern is that the image of the person you’re photographing looks like they do in real life.

With typically much less barrel or pincushion distortion than a standard kit zoom lens, prime lenses are already on to a winner.

SEE MORE: Best lens for portraits – 5 sensibly priced options tested and rated

Perspective is an even bigger consideration. For natural portraiture, a distance of about two metres between the photographer and the person being photographed is often ideal.

People seldom feel comfortable with a wide-angle lens stuck in their face, while a long telephoto puts too much distance between you.

Further complications are that if you photograph somebody from very close with a wide-angle lens, the closest part of the face will look disproportionately large.

You can end up giving somebody an enormous nose and tiny ears, which they’re unlikely to feel pleased about.

Telephoto lenses have the opposite effect, tending to flatten the face. It’s not as objectionable as the wide-angle effect, but people can end up looking a bit two-dimensional.

Given that a focal length of around 50mm enables natural portrait photography on SLRs with APS-C format image sensors, and a focal length of about 85mm is practically perfect for full-frame cameras, a zoom lens’s main claim to versatility is nullified.

SEE MORE: What your camera captures at every focal length (free photography cheat sheet)

It’s not completely an ‘either or’ choice when choosing focal lengths. As it turns out, a 50mm lens on a full-frame body is convenient for full-length portraits, while an 85mm lens on an APS-C body can be ideal for tight head-and-shoulders compositions.

Either way, the 85mm lenses in this test group are especially tempting yet affordable propositions if you already own a full-frame camera, or are thinking of upgrading to one.

Best budget prime lens: how to get shallow depth of field

Be more shallow

A particular problem with kit zoom lenses is that they tend to have a variable aperture range that shrinks from around f/4 to f/5.6 as you extend through the zoom range.

So, while a typical 18-55m lens might give an ideal focal length for APS-C based portraiture at its long end, the widest available aperture of f/5.6 is counter-productive.

That’s because real-world backgrounds are often detailed and fussy. Unless you’re shooting in a studio with carefully arranged backdrops, you’ll often want to blur the background.

This focuses the attention on the person being photographed, lessening the emphasis on their surroundings.

Wider available apertures of between f/1.4 and f/2.8 enable you to do this, so that the person really stands out in the shot. In the versatility stakes, it’s a major plus point for prime lenses.

Another bonus is that some of the most attractive portraits are taken in soft, dull, shady or downright gloomy lighting conditions.

A relatively wide aperture comes to your aid here as well, as you’ll be able to retain a sufficiently fast aperture to avoid camera-shake during handheld shooting, without having to bump up the camera’s sensitivity setting.

SEE MORE: What is the best aperture and focal length for portraits?

This is always a good thing for retaining optimum image quality. It also helps to minimise any motion blur on the part of the person being photographed, without needing them to hold their breath and remain absolutely still.

Naturally, some high-end standard zoom lenses for both APS-C and full-frame cameras have a constant-aperture design that delivers a fairly wide f/2.8 aperture throughout their zoom range.

However, they tend to be big, bulky and heavy compared to a 50mm or 85mm prime lens. And while all of the prime lenses in this test group cost less than £400, a top-quality f/2.8 standard zoom can cost anything up to £1,800.

SEE MORE: Canon lenses – 40 tips for using, choosing and buying Canon-fit glass
Nikon lenses from A-Z: the ultimate photographers’ guide

How wide should you go?

Lenses that offer an extra-wide aperture of around f/1.4 often give a pleasant softness at their widest aperture settings.

This can be handy for smoothing over wrinkles and blemishes when the people you’re shooting are a certain age, as well as giving portraits a soft and subtle dreamy look.

However, It’s not ideal if you’re a fan of super-sharp eyes in portraits. There’s a lot to be said for lenses that are able to capture sharp images when you need them, even at their widest apertures.

You can always soften images or selected parts of them at the editing stage, if desired.

There’s an additional bonus in both of the f/2.8 lenses featured in this group test: the Sigma 70mm and Tamron 90mm are both full macro lenses.

This means that they give a 1.0x magnification ratio at their closest focus distance, and are therefore equally well suited to shooting extreme close-ups of small objects.

The downside is that their widest available aperture is either two-thirds of an f/stop or two full f/stops slower than f/1.8 and f/1.4 lenses respectively

Regardless of any dual-purpose advantage, a more crucial aspect of portrait lenses is their bokeh, or the quality of defocused areas.

The ideal is that defocused background or foreground areas look as smooth as possible, and that highlights or bright spots of light are represented as smooth discs rather than having noticeable geometric shapes.

This can be difficult to achieve when narrowing the lens’s aperture from its fully open setting, as the diaphragm blades come into effect.

Fast autofocus is also preferable: even though you’re not trying to track sporting action, it’s still frustrating to miss fleeting expressions because your camera and lens are dawdling over autofocus.

7 questions photographers should ask when buying their next lens
11 common lens errors (and how you can avoid them)

Best budget prime lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM £305

Best budget prime lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM £305

Canon’s mid-range 50mm prime lens sits between the low-budget f/1.8 and the enormously expensive f/1.2 L-series models. The latter costs four times the price of the sensibly priced f/1.4, making it unaffordable to most.

With a decent set of specifications for a mid-range 50mm lens, this one features an eight-blade diaphragm, ultrasonic autofocus and a focus distance scale neatly positioned under a viewing window.

Canon’s Super Spectra coatings are applied to help combat ghosting and flare under harsh lighting.

Dig a little deeper and there’s room for improvement. Rather than ring-type ultrasonic autofocus, the lens employs Micro-USM, based on a motor.

Autofocus is a little sluggish and clearly audible but, unusually for its breed, still boasts full-time manual override in the host camera’s One Shot AF mode.

Overall build quality is pretty good at the price, and the manual focus ring is smooth and precise.

At 74x51mm in size and 290g in weight, it’s one of the smallest and most lightweight lenses in the group, along with the competing Nikon 50mm f/1.4.

SEE MORE: Canon EOS cameras – 100 things you never knew they could do


Making the most of its rounded aperture, the Canon gives a pleasantly smooth and creamy bokeh.

However, like many lenses that have such a wide available aperture, sharpness and contrast are lacking at f/1.4.

Compared with other lenses in this test group, the Canon takes longer to get into its stride as you narrow the aperture, only delivering excellent sharpness as you hit f/8.

Vignetting (darkened image corners) are also quite noticeable at f/1.4, even on cameras that use an APS-C image sensor.

Features: 3/5
Build/Handling: 4/5
Image quality: 4/5
Value: 4/5
Overall: 4/5

Tech focus
7 elements in 6 groups, 8 diaphragm blades, closest focus distance 45cm, 58mm filter thread, ultrasonic motor autofocus, physical dimensions 74x51mm, weight 290g

10 reasons your pictures aren’t sharp (and how to fix them)
Best camera focus techniques: 10 surefire ways to get sharp photos
Getting sharp images: every photo technique you need to know starting out

Best budget prime lens: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, £305

Best budget prime lens: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, £305

With a longer focal length than the 50mm f/1.4 lenses on test, this one enables a tighter depth of field at close focusing distances, despite its widest available aperture being a little narrower.

Apart from the step up in focal length, this lens also delivers greater autofocus prowess than the Canon 50mm, with ring-type ultrasonic autofocus that’s amazingly fast and near-silent.

However, there are plenty of similarities between the two Canon lenses, including an eight-blade diaphragm, a close match in build quality, Super Spectra coatings, a 58mm filter thread, and an identical price.

Handling is refined, with excellent smoothness in the focus ring and the advantage that the focus ring doesn’t rotate during autofocus.

The latter attribute is shared by all other lenses in the group apart from the Sigma 70mm and the manual-only focusing Samyang 85mm.

SEE MORE: 49 seriously good Canon DSLR tips, tricks, shortcuts and time savers


Despite being only two thirds of a stop slower than the Canon 50mm f/1.4, the 85mm lens delivers very different characteristics in image quality.

Surprisingly, given the same filter thread of 58mm, the longer lens shows less vignetting at its widest aperture.

More noticeably, while the 50mm f/1.4 is soft at its widest aperture, the 85mm lens is super-sharp with great contrast, even when shooting wide open.

Better still, bokeh is wonderfully smooth, and even transitional areas at the edges of the depth of field are handled remarkably well.

Overall, it’s a fabulous lens that’s also unbeatable value for money at the price.

Features: 4/5
Build/Handling: 5/5
Image quality: 5/5
Value: 5/5
Overall: 5/5

Tech focus
9 elements in 7 groups, 8 diaphragm blades, closest focus distance 85cm, 58mm filter thread, ring-type ultrasonic autofocus, physical dimensions 75x72mm, weight 425g

Best budget prime lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , EF 85mm f/1.8
Best budget prime lens: Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, AF-S 85mm f/1.8G
Best budget prime lens: Samyang 85mm f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4
Best budget prime lens: Sigma 70mm f/2.8, Tamron 90mm f/2.8
Best budget prime lens: Verdict
6 features to look for in a prime lens


Master your camera’s autofocus: which AF points to use and when to use them
54 Portrait Ideas: free downloadable posing guide
Classic portrait ideas: how to take pictures of people from all walks of life

14 portrait photography tips you’ll never want to forget
10 common camera mistakes every photographer makes

  • Sorin Tudorica

    I don’t see any Sony lens in your review, why?

  • David Matei

    Sorin Tudorica, Pentru ca Sony nu face obiective, altii fac obiective pentru ei :)

  • David Matei

    Did you know that Tamron makes lens for Zeiss ? I think Tamron it’s the best lens here.

  • You cannot go wrong with the nifty fifty from Canon at that price.