AT LAST Apple makes more than one monitor, thanks to the new Studio Display

Apple Studio Display
(Image credit: Apple)

The new Apple Studio Display is great news, but it is frankly about time. Until now, the only monitor made by Apple has been the monster-sized and monster-priced 32-inch Pro Display XDR – which might be fine for design studios and pro filmmakers, but completely out of the ballpark for regular users.

So the Apple Studio Display is no bargain either, but at £1,599 / $1,899 (about AU$2,600), it is at least within reach. It also addresses a huge blind spot in Apple’s product line-up which I can’t believe has been left wide open for so long.

You buy a Mac Mini, you need a screen

So picture this. You walk into an Apple Store and head straight for the Mac Mini counter to pick up an M1 Mac Mini, perhaps the most tempting compact desktop computer on the market right now. Fine, but you’ll also need a screen.

Not just any old screen. You’ll need one that reflects the design and display quality of Apple’s Retina displays, as used in MacBooks and iMacs, right?

Well, there isn’t one. It’s the same if you get a MacBook, intending to hook it up to a larger, better monitor when you are at your desk. Apple doesn’t sell them in the store and doesn’t even recommend third-party screens. You’re on your own.

That, to me, is madness. It’s the one thing that’s stopped me swapping my five-year-old iMac for a Mini – and stops me recommending the Mini to friends, even though it’s probably the best computer for them to buy right now.

The Apple Studio Display looks expensive – until you try to find a third-party screen that can do what this does. (Image credit: Apple)

What displays will suit a Mac?

So it sounds easy enough – you go shopping with Dell, or BenQ or Samsung or a bunch of other monitors makers to get a third-party screen. And that’s when you realise how much these darned things cost.

Our guide to the best monitors for Mac mini has a couple of cheaper alternatives, but if you want Retina-quality resolution it means getting a big screen, and that really pushes up the price. Suddenly the new Apple Studio Display doesn’t look that expensive any more – not when you compare the specs.

Look, Apple, just take the screen out of the 24-inch iMac and sell it on its own. (Image credit: Apple)

Now we need a cheaper Apple Studio Display

The Apple Studio Display looks like a seriously good monitor at a not-outrageous price for what it does. But it stills costs more than your Mac Mini and, quite possibly, than your MacBook or iMac.

So what if, pleeeease, Apple were to take the rather excellent screen from the 24-inch M1 iMac and package it up as an Apple Studio MINI DISPLAY? It looks like that shouldn’t cost more than $1,000 tops, and would wipe the floor with most third-party 4K 24-inch screens out there right now.

If Tim Cook doesn’t phone me up this afternoon to thank me, I’ll be gutted.

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Rod Lawton

Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-standing Digital Camera World contributor, having previously worked as DCW's Group Reviews editor. Before that he has been technique editor on N-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography division and Camera Channel editor on TechRadar, as well as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at but also writes about photo-editing applications and techniques at