Best Canon standard zoom lenses: for Canon DSLRs, EOS R and EOS M

best Canon standard zoom lenses
(Image credit: PhotoPlus magazine)

Standard zooms are often sold as 'kit lenses' Canon cameras, so you can buy a camera body complete with a standard zoom as a kit, typically saving money in the process. And to be hones, I think that some of Canon's kit lenses are so good that you might never need to consider upgrading. Even so, you might want to look at replacing your kit lens with something more up-market, perhaps offering a greater zoom range or a faster, constant aperture, or just for premium image quality and all-round performance. Let's face it, most of us use a standard zoom for everyday shooting, most of the time, so it pays to have a great one.

As I've just touched on, a major reason for upgrading to a new standard zoom lens is so you can get a lens with a wider maximum aperture, typically f/2.8, that remains available throughout the zoom range. This enables faster shutter speeds under dull or indoor lighting conditions, without the need to bump up your ISO setting too much, and gives the option of a tighter depth of field, bringing bokeh into the mix.

It's not just Canon that makes great standard zoom lenses, and I've included a couple of Sigma alternatives for both DSLRs and EOS R system mirrorless cameras, that are definitely worthy of consideration.

I've split this guide to the best Canon standard zoom lenses into five categories, tailored to 'EF-S' APS-C format DSLRs, 'EF' full-frame DSLRs, 'RF-S' and 'RF' for APS-C and full-frame EOS R system mirrorless cameras respectively, and finally older 'EF-M' APS-C format mirrorless cameras. With all that in mind, here's my guide to the best standard zoom lenses for whatever type of Canon camera you use...

The Quick List

Canon EF-S

(Image credit: Canon)
A veteran APS-C Canon DSLR lens, with high-quality build and a constant aperture

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 27-88mm
Lens construction: 19 elements in 12 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 7 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.35m
Filter size: 77mm
Dimensions: 84x111mm
Weight: 645g

Reasons to buy

+
Sturdy build
+
Fast and quiet autofocus

Reasons to avoid

-
No weather-seals
-
Hood not included

This is the closest thing to a pro-grade, L-series ‘EF-S’ lens for APS-C cameras that Canon has ever built. Unlike Canon’s f/2.8 standard zooms for full-frame DSLRs, this one features an image stabilizer. Yet it’s an old version of the technology and only gives three, rather than four, stops of advantage in fending off camera-shake. Compared with the autofocus systems of other APS-C lenses on test, it’s faster and quieter, if not near-silent as in Canon’s STM or Nano USM lenses. Lab scores for sharpness proved underwhelming for our particular lab-test sample, but I’ve always been impressed by the lens’s clarity in my wide-ranging real-world tests, and how other samples have performed in the past.

Read the full Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM review

Canon EF

(Image credit: Sigma)
Better than Canon's own 24-70mm lens for full frame Canon DSLRs

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-70mm
Lens construction: 19 elements in 14 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 9 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.37m
Filter size: 82mm
Dimensions: 88x108mm
Weight: 1,020g

Reasons to buy

+
Superb handling and image quality
+
Effective optical stabilizer
+
Works with Canon in-camera corrections

Reasons to avoid

-
Relatively large and weighty

I prefer this lens to Canon’s own EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM standard zoom for DSLRs and think it's a much smarter buy. Both have an identical zoom range and aperture rating, and both lenses deliver similarly excellent image quality in all respects. The big plus point for the Sigma is that it features an optical image stabilizer, which can be incredibly useful for general walkabout shooting. Another neat extra is that it’s compatible with Sigma’s optional USB Dock, which you can use for fine-tuning and customizing the lens, as well as for applying firmware updates. And like many Sigma Global Vision lenses, it can take full advantage of in-camera corrections in current and recent Canon DSLRs, for the likes of lateral chromatic aberration, distortion, and peripheral illumination. All in all, it’s a highly desirable lens at a very attractive price and has long been my go-to standard zoom for Canon DSLRs.

Read the full Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM | A review

(Image credit: Canon)
This Mk II edition is pretty ideal for full frame Canon DSLRs... at a price

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-70mm
Lens construction: 18 elements in 13 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 9 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.38m
Filter size: 82mm
Dimensions: 89x113mm
Weight: 805g

Reasons to buy

+
Excellent image quality
+
Fast, whisper-quiet autofocus
+
Build quality

Reasons to avoid

-
No optical stabilizer

The standard zoom of choice for many pro photographers, Canon’s original 24-70mm f/2.8L was something of a classic. As you’d expect from Canon’s range-topping standard zoom, autofocus comes courtesy of a fast and whisper-quiet ring-type ultrasonic system. Image quality is excellent, with great sharpness and contrast even when shooting wide-open. Sharpness has been improved towards the edges of the frame but, even so, the ability to capture consistently sharp handheld images can suffer due to the lack of an optical stabilizer, featured in the competing Sigma lens that I've listed already. The lack of stabilization aside, this simply delivers top-class performance.

Read the full Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM review

(Image credit: Canon)
A great longer range standard zoom for full frame Canon SLRs

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-105mm
Lens construction: 17 elements in 12 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 10 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.45m
Filter size: 77m
Dimensions: 84x118mm
Weight: 795g

Reasons to buy

+
Extensive weather-seals
+
Four-stop image stabilizer
+
Constant aperture value

Reasons to avoid

-
Barrel distortion 

This newer Mark II edition of the 24-105mm has been redesigned to be tougher and more resistant to shock and vibration, as well as featuring fluorine coatings on the front and rear elements. More importantly, for my money, the optics have been revamped, with the aim of improving sharpness across the whole image frame, and throughout the zoom range. Barrel distortion from the preceding 24-105mm lens was notoriously bad at the short end of the zoom range, but the Mk II performs a little better. It’s also a bit sharper (as promised), autofocus is a little quicker and bokeh is smoother, thanks to the fitment of ten, rather than eight, diaphragm blades. Overall, however, each of the improvements is quite subtle rather than making a hugely noticeable difference.

Read the full Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM review

Canon RF-S

(Image credit: Future)
Best own-brand standard zoom for APS-C format EOS R cameras

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 29-72mm
Lens construction: 7 elements in 7 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 7 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.2m
Filter size: 49mm
Dimensions: 44x62mm
Weight: 124g

Reasons to buy

+
Up to 6.5 stops of IS
+
Super small and light
+
Quick, quiet autofocus

Reasons to avoid

-
Slow aperture
-
Not weather sealed
-
Big distortion & fringing if uncorrected

The Canon RF-S 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM is an incredibly lean, lightweight lens that's a great match for the whole range of compact, APS-C format EOS R system mirrorless cameras. Its image quality is better than it has any right to be, and it even boasts 4 stops of image stabilization (which ramps all the way up to 6.5 on a body with IBIS in the EOS R7). I fell that it's an ideal everyday companion for stills and video shooting.

Read the full Canon RF-S 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM review

(Image credit: Future)
An alternative 'RF-S' standard zoom, with a faster aperture

Specifications

Mount: Canon RF
Equiv focal length: 28.8-80mm
Stabilization: None
Min focus distance: 0.12m
Max magnification: 0.36x
Filter size: 55mm
Dimensions: 69.2 x 74.5mm, 300g

Reasons to buy

+
+Constant f/2.8 maximum aperture
+
Value for money
+
Image quality

Reasons to avoid

-
No optical stabilizer (no problem for the EOS R7)

The Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN offers a constant f/2.8 aperture, unlike the competing Canon standard zoom, with a classic 3x zoom range for this class of lens. The Sigma is smaller than you’d expect given its constant maximum aperture yet the build quality is very good – and it’s weather-resistant as well.

The autofocus system is super-fast and virtually silent, and I was impressed by the quality of the images. It's very much like a 'trinity' standard zoom, downsized from full-frame to APS-C format, and very good value at the price.

Read more: Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN | C review

Canon RF

(Image credit: Canon)
The best RF standard zoom for quality, versatility and cost-effectiveness

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-105mm
Lens construction: 18 elements in 14 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 9 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.45m
Filter size: 77mm
Dimensions: 84x107mm
Weight: 700g

Reasons to buy

+
Fast Nano USM autofocus
+
5-stop optical image stabilizer

Reasons to avoid

-
Customisable control ring
-
Feels a little weighty on an EOS R

A highly popular choice for EOS R-series cameras, this lens occupies the middle-ground between the compact, low-budget RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM and the mighty RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM. The former has a disappointingly narrow aperture at longer zoom settings, while the latter has a relatively limited zoom range and is much pricier to buy. For my money, the 24-105mm f/4 offers an ideal compromise. It has a very versatile zoom range with a constant f/4 aperture rating, it’s not overly big or heavy, and is competitively priced. Highlights in handling and performance include a customisable control ring, 5-stop optical stabilization and fast Nano USM autofocus, all wrapped up in a weather-sealed and typically sturdy construction, befitting an L-series lens.

Read the full Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM review

(Image credit: Canon)
A high-performance pro grade standard zoom for EOS R cameras

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-70mm
Lens construction: 21 elements in 15 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 9 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.21-0.38m
Filter size: 82mm
Dimensions: 89x126mm
Weight: 900g

Reasons to buy

+
Top-drawer build quality and performance
+
Nano USM AF and 5-stop stabilization
+
Customisable control ring

Reasons to avoid

-
Expensive to buy

Unless you’re desperate for the faster aperture of Canon’s huge RF 28-70mm f/2L USM standard zoom, which tips the scales at nearly 1.5kg and is fiendishly expensive to buy, the 24-70mm is the better option. At 900g, it’s more manageable and is actually only 200g heavier than the RF 24-105mm f/4 lens. Naturally, it’s an f/stop faster but has less telephoto reach. The premium optical design includes three aspherical elements and three UD (Ultra-low Dispersion) elements, along with high-tech Air Sphere Coating to minimize ghosting and flare. There’s also a fluorine coating on the front and rear elements, to repel moisture and finger marks. High-speed Nano USM autofocus and 5-stop stabilization are featured but I feel that it’s the sensational image quality of this lens that makes it worth its undeniably up-market price tag.

Read the full Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM review

(Image credit: Canon)
Ultra-fast Canon standard zoom lens with a constant aperture of f/2

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 28-70mm
Lens construction: 19 elements in 13 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 9 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.39m
Filter size: 95mm
Dimensions: 104x140mm
Weight: 1430g

Reasons to buy

+
Stunning image quality
+
Fast f/2 maximum aperture
+
Weather-sealed construction

Reasons to avoid

-
Heavy and expensive

The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM is a bit of a monster, weighing in at 1,430g. The reason for this is that it's a full f/stop faster than most professional f/2.8 standard zoom lenses, boasting a maximum aperture of f/2 at all focal lengths. With a design that goes all out for premium image quality, it's a fabulous lens that really can rival three or four separate prime lenses. There's no optical image stabilization though, so to help reduce camera shake, you'll want to pair it with one of Canon's later EOS R system cameras that feature in-body image stabilization. The zoom range is a bit limited at the wide-angle end but the f/2 aperture is great for gaining a tight depth of field, along with beautiful bokeh.

Read the full Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM review

Canon EOS M

(Image credit: Canon)
Really small and lightweight, it’s a little gem for the EOS M

Specifications

Effective zoom range: 24-72mm
Lens construction: 10 elements in 9 groups
No. of diaphragm blades: 7 blades
Minimum focus distance: 0.25m
Filter size: 49mm
Dimensions: 61x45mm
Weight: 130g

Reasons to buy

+
Compact, retractable design
+
Generous wide-angle perspective

Reasons to avoid

-
Hood sold separately
-
Sharpness is good rather than great

Despite its impressive 24-72mm ‘effective’ zoom range, this retractable lens measures a mere 61x45mm and is a real featherweight at just 130g. To put that into perspective, a complete outfit comprising an EOS M camera body plus all three of Canon’s standard 15-45mm, 11-22mm wide-angle and 55-200mm telephoto zooms weighs as little as Sigma’s full-frame 24-70mm f/2.8 lens on its own, with no camera attached. Although small, the lens feels sturdy, has good handling characteristics and is impeccably turned out in a choice of silver or graphite finishes. The stepping motor autofocus system is quick and virtually silent, and the image stabilizer lives up to its 4-stop billing. It’s not the sharpest tool in Canon’s box but image quality is very satisfying overall, and it's the ideal standard zoom for cameras like the Canon EOS M200 and EOS M50 Mark II.

Read the full Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM review

Lab data and comparisons

The graphs below show the comparative performance of the lenses in this guide, based on our in-house lab tests. The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM leads the way for sharpness while the Canon RF-S 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM is the least impressive for control over distortion and color fringing, although automatic in-camera correction is available.

Scores for sharpness and color fringing are averaged from data taken across the entire image frame, from the center to the edges and corners, throughout the aperture range. For zoom lenses, the scores are also averaged from data measured at all marked focal lengths, and the same applies to distortion. Bear in mind that these average values don't fully reflect specific areas of performance. For example, a zoom lens might have noticeable barrel and pincushion distortion at its shortest and longest focal lengths respectively, which tends to average out when looking at the data overall. For more detailed graphs of each lens's performance, which give the full picture, check out the graphs in our full standalone lens reviews.

How we test lenses

Why you can trust Digital Camera World Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out how we test.

We test lenses using a mix of both real world sample images and lab tests. Our lab tests are carried out scientifically in controlled conditions using the Imatest testing suite, which consists of custom charts and analysis software that measures resolution in line widths/picture height, a measurement widely used in lens and camera testing. We find the combination of lab and real-word testing works best, as each reveals different qualities and characteristics.

Matthew Richards

Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear. He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer – and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners! 

His expertise with equipment doesn’t end there, though. He is also an encyclopedia  when it comes to all manner of cameras, camera holsters and bags, flashguns, tripods and heads, printers, papers and inks, and just about anything imaging-related. 

In an earlier life he was a broadcast engineer at the BBC, as well as a former editor of PC Guide.