I called this "the perfect camera" – so I put my money where my mouth is and bought one

Black-and-white image of James Artaius holding an OM System OM-3
(Image credit: James Artaius)

"The perfect camera… for me." That was the headline to my OM System OM-3 review.

I'm aware that I can be a bit hyperbolic at times, but that's because I truly love taking pictures and using great gear. So when I'm reviewing cameras and lenses, I'm not evaluating them empirically and dispassionately like a scientist with a clipboard. And I'm not testing them solely for the purpose of telling other people whether they're good or not.

What I'm also doing is test driving them for myself. Because I buy a lot of cameras, and I'm a jammy bastard in that I get to review them for a living. So every camera that lands on my desk is something I might potentially purchase. Which means that I look at every one of them from the perspective of, "Would I buy this?"

So, the headline wasn't just hyperbole; after reviewing the OM-3, I was so impressed that I went out and spent my own money on one. As, in fact, did a number of other journalists who reviewed it – because it really is that good.

OM System OM-3, with an M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 II, sat on a wooden surface

(Image credit: James Artaius)

What makes the OM-3 the perfect camera (for me)

The other day, a friend of mine asked me when and why I use the kit that I use – bearing in mind that I juggle OM, Canon and Hasselblad cameras. My answer was that my OM kit – and the OM-3 specifically – is the most agile and creative camera that I own.

Being nimble is important in the way I shoot – both in terms of physical size and performance. To the first point, I'm a portrait photographer and I use primes 90% of the time. And once I've got the images on my shot list, I start to freestyle – which means hot-swapping my four favorite primes (the M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, 25mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8 and 75mm f/1.8).

I can literally have all four of these primes in my pockets, because Micro Four Thirds lenses are so small. I can't do that with RF lenses or Hasselblad lenses. I can whack them on and off the camera without looking, almost one-handed, so I can go, "Right, 90mm isn't working – let's try 50mm").

Obviously these lenses all pair perfectly with the compact OM-3 (even though it's large for a Micro Four Thirds camera, and I wouldn't want one that was any bigger). But the way they perform on it is just smooth as silk.

My favorite portrait camera was always the Olympus PEN-F, for one simple reason: the Creative Dial. When I'm shooting spontaneously, I flick between the various color profiles and filters to get the look I want in-camera. But the PEN-F has a contrast-based autofocus system that, while perfectly usable, just isn't as fast as the algorithmic AF on modern cameras.

OM System OM-3 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III cameras on a wooden surface

Everything that was great about the PEN-F (left) is now in the OM-3 (right) (Image credit: James Artaius)

So the OM-3 gives me all the creative juice of the PEN-F with the autofocus and performance and image quality of the flagship OM-1 Mark II, with which it shares the same technology. And it supercharges those little lenses, making them more responsive than ever before.

It also suits my needs incredibly well for everyday video when I don't want to settle for my smartphone – not least because I can easily dial in a preset or profile if I'm pushed for time.

When I need to shoot guns-blazing video for client work, I'll go for my Canon EOS R5. But for most of the video I shoot day-to-day – TikTok nonsense, behind-the-scenes footage, something quick for a Story or Reel – the OM-3 takes great video whether I'm slumming it in 1080p or I want something 10-bit and 4K.

On top of that, I can take the OM-3 out in the rain because it's properly IP53 certified (unlike the nondescript "weather sealing" on other cameras that I wouldn't trust in a hundred years), the battery life is great and it's so good-looking that it becomes a conversation-starter – I've already had a handful of people start chatting to me because they thought it was an analog camera.

So, $2,000 later, is this still the perfect camera for me? Absolutely. No matter what I ask of this camera, it can do it – whether it's resolution (80MP High Res Shot), shallow depth of field (with my 75mm or f/0.95 lenses), wildlife (unbelievably accurate subject detection) or even just looking pretty on my shelf. It was the best two grand I've ever spent on a camera.

(Image credit: James Artaius)

OM System OM-3 + M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 II (1.5 sec, f/1.8, ISO200) (Image credit: James Artaius)

OM System OM-3 + M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8 II (1/125 sec, f/1.8, ISO200) (Image credit: James Artaius)

OM System OM-3 + M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 (1/40 sec, f/8.0, ISO400) (Image credit: James Artaius)

(Image credit: James Artaius)

OM System OM-3 + M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 Pro (1/320 sec, f/2.8, ISO400 (Image credit: James Artaius)

OM System OM-3 + M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 (1/40 sec, f/1.8, ISO200) (Image credit: James Artaius)

You might also like…

Got an OM-3? Take a look at the best lenses for the OM System OM-3. Still deciding? See how it stacks up against the best OM System cameras and the best Micro Four Thirds cameras.

TOPICS
James Artaius
Editor in Chief

James has 25 years experience as a journalist, serving as the head of Digital Camera World for 7 of them. He started working in the photography industry in 2014, product testing and shooting ad campaigns for Olympus, as well as clients like Aston Martin Racing, Elinchrom and L'Oréal. An Olympus / OM System, Canon and Hasselblad shooter, he has a wealth of knowledge on cameras of all makes – and he loves instant cameras, too.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.