Apple is definitely, finally, killing off Aperture for sure this time…

Apple Aperture

Development on Aperture officially ended in June 2014, but there had been signs long before then that Apple was growing tired of its professional photo organising and editing application. Lightroom was forging ahead with more and more advanced editing tools while Aperture’s updates were becoming more and more sporadic.

Now, in an announcement on Apple’s support site, the company says the next version of its operating system, the follow up to the current Mojave release, will not be compatible with Aperture. Until now, Aperture has been able to keep stumbling along with each new OS release, but we understand the last vestiges of 32-bit code will be removed in the new OS, leaving Aperture unable to run.

It’s a sad epitaph for a program many Mac fans felt was better than Adobe Lightroom, certainly from an organisational perspective, and one that would certainly have been on our list of the best photo editing software.

In the same technical bulletin, Apple does give help and advice on how to migrate Aperture libraries to its own more beginner-orientated Photos software or its one-time arch rival Lightroom. For Aperture fans, it's a bit like being advised on how to swap from a Ferrari to a Ford pickup.

Do you wish Lightroom could do this?

Lightroom is regarded by most as the bee’s knees for photo organisation, but there are still some clunky or missing features that may never be addressed:

  • Currently, photos grouped (stacked) in one Lightroom Collection are not grouped in another. Wouldn’t it be great if photos were grouped globally so that you could always find raw and JPEG image versions together, or all virtual copies and externally-edited versions?
  • Even if Lightroom could do this, it would also need a system for changing the top picture (or ‘pick’) in each group, and it doesn’t have this option.
  • And wouldn’t it be great if Folders and Collections were NOT two completely different organisational systems in two completely different panels? Why can’t you combine the two and have Projects, say, as containers for your photos and albums within those?

What’s sad about the final demise of Aperture is that it did all of these things. It’s not about Apple versus Lightroom, or about Apple versus the rest, it’s about great software design being lost for ever (boo!).

Read more:

The best Adobe Photography Plan deals for Photoshop CC and Lightroom
Crash course: Lightroom Classic CC for complete beginners

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Rod Lawton

Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-standing Digital Camera World contributor, having previously worked as DCW's Group Reviews editor. Before that he has been technique editor on N-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography division and Camera Channel editor on TechRadar, as well as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at but also writes about photo-editing applications and techniques at