Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm f/2.8 review

The Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 is the pro-level fast standard zoom for S1-series cameras, but is it worth the money?

Panasonic S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
(Image: © Matthew Richards)

Digital Camera World Verdict

A step up from Panasonic’s S 24-105mm f/4 standard zoom, this ‘PRO’ lens has a faster f/2.8 aperture rating but lacks optical stabilization, instead relying on the 5-axis in-body stabilization of S1-series cameras. In keeping with these bodies, it’s a big, chunky lens but very well-built. However, image quality isn’t any better than from the competing Sigma 24-70mm DG DN Art lens, which costs half the price.


  • +

    Fast and constant f/2.8 aperture

  • +

    Advanced autofocus system

  • +

    Dust, splash and freeze-resistant


  • -

    Lacks optical stabilization

  • -

    Fairly big and heavy

  • -

    Sharpness falls at longer zoom settings

Why you can trust Digital Camera World Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out how we test.

If you thought that going mirrorless would save on size and weight, the Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 might make you think again. The combined weight of an S1 or S1R body and this 24-70mm lens is almost 2kg, so it’s not an outfit to be taken lightly, in any sense of the word. 

Compared with the Panasonic 24-105mm f/4 lens, it’s wider, nearly an inch longer and 255g more heavier. It’s also getting on for twice the price, while lacking the f/4 lens’s optical stabilizer, 0.5x macro capability and extra telephoto reach. All in all, you’re sacrificing a lot for that extra f/stop in aperture rating.

Panasonic Lumix S cameras are the best professional cameras and certainly among the best 4K cameras for filmmaking and best cinema cameras, especially with the launch of the new Panasonic Lumix S5. Panasonic is also contributing to an ambitious L-mount lens roadmap, where this new 24-70mm f/2.8 lens is just one of many.

Best L-mount lenses


Mount: L-mount
Full frame: Yes
Image stabilization: No
Autofocus: Yes
Lens construction: 18 elements in 16 groups
Angle of view: 84-34 degrees
Diaphragm blades: 11
Minimum aperture: f/22
Minimum focusing distance: 0.37m
Maximum magnification ratio: 0.25x
Filter size: 82mm
Dimensions: 91x140mm
Weight: 935g

Key features

The key feature of this lens is its f/2.8 aperture rating, which remains available throughout the entire zoom range. This enables a fairly tight depth of field, especially at longer focal lengths, useful for portraiture and still life photography. The availability of faster shutter speeds also helps to freeze action and reduce the effects of camera-shake under dull lighting, without the need to bump up your ISO setting too much.

Naturally, the quality of the optical design is a key consideration in any lens, especially those with professional aspirations. Panasonic states that the 24-70mm ‘satisfies the stringent certification standards of Leica Camera AG’ and a notice of this is duly stamped onto the barrel. The optical path itself contains 18 elements in total, including three aspherical elements, four ED (Extra-low Dispersion) elements and one UHR (Ultra-High Refractive index) element. The aim is for optimum sharpness and contrast with the minimum of colour fringing and other aberrations.

(Image credit: Panasonic)

Build and handling

The lens features a dual-drive autofocus system, employing both linear and stepping motor actuators. Autofocus is intended to be quick and whisper-quiet, while also enabling smooth focus transitions during movie capture. Reminiscent of Tokina lenses, a clutch mechanism allows autofocus or manual focus to be selected by snapping the focus ring forward or backwards respectively. It’s certainly quick and easy to operate but can be a frustration if you nudge the ring backwards accidentally and lose autofocus at a critical moment.

As with most standard zooms, the physical length extends at longer zoom settings. There’s no zoom lock switch but, despite the fairly heavy front group of elements, we didn’t experience any zoom creep when testing the lens. Weather-seals are fitted to assure dust/splash resistance and the lens is built to operate in freezing conditions down to -10 degrees Celsius. A plastic petal-shaped hood is supplied with the lens, which is of good quality and features a lock-release button.


The speedy, high-precision autofocus lives up to its billing, while manual focusing benefits from a smooth-action control ring with just over 45 degrees of rotational travel. Sharpness is a bit of a moveable feast. In the 24-35mm sector of the zoom range, centre-sharpness is excellent even when shooting wide-open, although corner-sharpness is underwhelming at apertures wider than f/5.6. In our tests, sharpness in the 50-70mm range proved less impressive than in the competing Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art lens.

(Image credit: Matthew Richards)

This pair of shots taken at 24mm and 70mm demonstrate the overall zoom range. Corner-sharpness is good rather than great. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

Helped by automatic in-camera corrections, colour fringing is entirely negligible, even in the extreme corners of the image frame. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 sample image

There’s very little barrel distortion even when shooting at the widest-angle focal length of 24mm. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

From around 30mm onwards, there’s virtually no distortion, thanks in part to automatic in-camera correction. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

Towards the longer end of the zoom range, you can get a fairly tight depth of field with attractively smooth bokeh. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

Stop down to f/5.6 and bokeh remains impressive, helped by a well-rounded 11-blade aperture diaphragm. (Image credit: Matthew Richards)

Bokeh is nice and smooth, and remains high quality when stopping down a little, helped by a well-rounded 11-blade diaphragm. Again, Sigma’s lens matches the Panasonic in this respect. Both lenses display negligible distortions, thanks to auto-corrections which are applied even to raw files. Both lenses also perform similarly well in minimizing ghosting and flare. The only facet of image quality in which the Panasonic beats the Sigma is that wide-aperture vignetting is less apparent, when disabling the in-camera correction.

Lab tests

We run a range of lab tests under controlled conditions, using the Imatest Master testing suite. Photos of test charts are taken across the range of apertures and zooms (where available), then analyzed for sharpness, distortion and chromatic aberrations.

We use Imatest SFR (spatial frequency response) charts and analysis software to plot lens resolution at the centre of the image frame, corners and mid-point distances, across the range of aperture settings and, with zoom lenses, at four different focal lengths. The tests also measure distortion and color fringing (chromatic aberration).

(Image credit: Digital Camera World)

(Image credit: Digital Camera World)

Sharpness is mostly excellent in the central region of the frame but corner-sharpness is less impressive. Sigma’s competing 24mm-70 DG DN Art lens is sharper in the longer half of the zoom range, across the whole image frame.

(Image credit: Digital Camera World)

Both axial and transverse chromatic aberrations are very minimal, the latter remaining very low even at the extreme corners of the frame, throughout the aperture and zoom ranges.

(Image credit: Digital Camera World)

Helped by automatic in-camera corrections, distortion is fairly negligible. Our lab tests reveal very small amounts of barrel distortion throughout the zoom range.


Panasonic’s pro-grade 24-70mm f/2.8 is a first-class standard zoom with very good handling characteristics and a very sturdy construction. Autofocus is fast and reliable, although the clutch mechanism for swapping between autofocus and manual focus won’t meet universal approval. Image quality is very pleasing although it’s really no better than from the competing Sigma lens, which only costs half the price, making the Panasonic relatively poor value for money.

Read more:

The Panasonic L-mount lens roadmap
The best Panasonic cameras right now
The best professional cameras
The best 4K cameras for filmmakers

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Matthew Richards

Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear. He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer – and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners! 

His expertise with equipment doesn’t end there, though. He is also an encyclopedia  when it comes to all manner of cameras, camera holsters and bags, flashguns, tripods and heads, printers, papers and inks, and just about anything imaging-related. 

In an earlier life he was a broadcast engineer at the BBC, as well as a former editor of PC Guide.