Long GOP vs All-Intra: what are they and what’s the difference?

Panasonic Lumix GH5 II
(Image credit: Panasonic)

If you captured every frame in a video as a complete, high-quality image, your video files would be huge. The Canon EOS 5D IV took some flak for using an older MJPEG format that did exactly that. 

It also highlights the key difference between what we now call Long GOP compression (smaller files, potentially lower quality) and All-Intra, or All-I compression (larger files, potentially better quality).

Stills photographers will be used to JPEG compression, an acceptable compromise between image quality and file size. Video compression goes further, compressing not just individual frames but using compression techniques between frames to record only key changes in a frame, not the whole frame.

Long GOP and how it works

Long GOP stands for ‘Long Group of Pictures’. What happens here is that the camera records a key frame containing a full picture – the keyframe or ‘I’ frame – and then a group of ‘P’ frames and ‘B’ frames. ‘P’ frames contain ‘motion compensated’ difference information compared to previous frames. ‘B’ frames contain predictive difference information based on previous frames.

As far as playback and editing are concerned, the GOP (group of pictures) is treated and processed as a group, not individual frames.

Does this make a practical difference to video quality? It may do, especially if you film a lot of fast, complex movement, or if you want to extract a single, high quality still frame from the sequence.

On the other hand, Long GOP compression does produce smaller video file sizes – and is often the only choice on low-mid range cameras with limited processing power.

The more advanced Panasonic Lumix GH5 II offers both Long GOP and All-I (All-Intra) compression. Many cameras offer Long GOP only. (Image credit: Panasonic)

Do you need All-Intra?

More advanced video camera will also offer All-Intra compression, where each frame is captured ‘whole’. In theory, this will produce better quality video – or at least video that responds better to editing and single frame export.

However, it’s important to remember that this is only one type of video compression, and the many others in use will all be a factor in video quality – including bit-depth (8-bit vs 10-bit), color subsampling and codec choice. 

It’s like asking a photographer whether a JPEG is better than a TIFF. Sometimes you won’t be able to see a significant difference and the far smaller file size of a JPEG is far more important than any technical difference in quality with a TIFF.

Read more:

Best cameras for video
Best camera gimbals
Best video tripods
Best video editing software

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Rod Lawton

Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-standing Digital Camera World contributor, having previously worked as DCW's Group Reviews editor. Before that he has been technique editor on N-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography division and Camera Channel editor on TechRadar, as well as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at fotovolo.com but also writes about photo-editing applications and techniques at lifeafterphotoshop.com