PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Cameras & Equipment Forums > Lenses

Lenses Let's talk glass - from ultra-wide to super-tele.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-08-12, 01:41 PM
peteallen84 peteallen84 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
50mm Prime Lens for D3100

Hi all,

I've recently bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D3100, and I am considering getting a prime 50mm lens. I've had a look at the Nikon 50mm f1.8 D AF lensm which I've read good reviews of, but I understand this doesn't have autofocus with the D3100. As a newbie to photography I wonder, is this likely to make much difference in using the lens? Is there a better lens out there for my camera (and subsequent cameras as and when), or is this lens the best option for a newbie?

All advice and reviews would be hugely appreciated.

Cheers guys

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-12, 03:44 PM
markgozz markgozz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 1,197
Images: 70
Hi Pete the Nikon 50mm f1.8 G AF-S Lens will auto focus on the 3100 and it's compatible with FX format bodys if you upgrade in the future but you will have to extend your budget a bit from the f/1.8 D AF .
As a newbie to photography I think that auto focus is a handy advantage but not a necessity .

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-12, 07:42 PM
greenwing greenwing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 609
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by peteallen84 View Post
Hi all,

I've recently bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D3100, and I am considering getting a prime 50mm lens. I've had a look at the Nikon 50mm f1.8 D AF lensm which I've read good reviews of, but I understand this doesn't have autofocus with the D3100. As a newbie to photography I wonder, is this likely to make much difference in using the lens? Is there a better lens out there for my camera (and subsequent cameras as and when), or is this lens the best option for a newbie?

All advice and reviews would be hugely appreciated.

Cheers guys

Pete
I think the lack of AF would be a nuisance with the D3100. As Mark said, there's always the 50mm 1.8G AF-S.

But, why 50mm? Because that's what you've decided would be useful, or because people say you should? If you've decided it would be useful to you, go ahead & get it. If not, see if that's what you really need before you jump in.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-12, 11:43 PM
peteallen84 peteallen84 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
I think a 50mm would be useful, yeah, and I've read a lot of review on their benefits. I would like to try out lots of aspects of potography, which will obviously require different equipment, but I have to start somewhere! Other than the autofocus, are there any other major differences between the 50mm f1.8 D AF and the f1.8 G AF-S (other than about £60, of course)? Has anyone got either of these? Are you happy with it?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-08-12, 11:17 AM
beatnik69 beatnik69 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 200
The D is smaller and lighter than the G. I have both and get good results from each of them. You'll probably find the G more useful as it has the AF built in.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump