PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Photography Technique > General photography technique

General photography technique If you've got a photographic question, post it here - many of our forum members are able to offer advice, ideas and inspiration.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 31-01-12, 02:41 AM
clickin girl clickin girl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 134
Images: 60
What The Heck Is This????

http://

I shoot a lot of lightening and I always get this in my clouds. I thought it was noise at first but my Noiseware cleans up the light noise but seems to amplify this. Does anyone know what this is or what is causing it? How do I fix it? It is driving me crazy!!! It is all the areas that are circled in red.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-12, 07:33 AM
Markulous's Avatar
Markulous Markulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peak District
Posts: 579
Images: 1
Looks like pixellation to me - not unexpected in a JPG as it's often introduced as a compression artefact (but I'd be surprised if it was in a RAW!)

Is it in the original full size shot? Are you shooting RAW or JPG?
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-12, 02:53 PM
donoreo's Avatar
donoreo donoreo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,646
Images: 2
I cannot see what the problem is. The photo is too small for me to see anything.
__________________
My Flickr gallery
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-01-12, 04:27 PM
clickin girl clickin girl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 134
Images: 60
Mark, yes it is in RAW. I only shoot in RAW format!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-01-12, 04:29 PM
clickin girl clickin girl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 134
Images: 60
Also, in the original it is less noticeable but if I ever do any kind of PP at all it just magnifies it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-01-12, 05:42 PM
Markulous's Avatar
Markulous Markulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peak District
Posts: 579
Images: 1
If it's present in the original RAW then I'd suggest it's from very dark areas and camera struggling to record any detail, possibly clipping. When processed you're lightening (no pun intended!) an area that can't sustain any detail, so pixellating - or that's my guess
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-01-12, 06:59 PM
donoreo's Avatar
donoreo donoreo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,646
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markulous View Post
If it's present in the original RAW then I'd suggest it's from very dark areas and camera struggling to record any detail, possibly clipping. When processed you're lightening (no pun intended!) an area that can't sustain any detail, so pixellating - or that's my guess
I still cannot see anything, but this could be the case. There is a school of thought to always "expose to the right", referring to the histogram, as it works better (less noise) to darken a photo than it does to lighten one.
__________________
My Flickr gallery
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-01-12, 07:11 PM
clickin girl clickin girl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 134
Images: 60
Hmmm. Maybe so, makes since! Thanks for the input!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31-01-12, 07:57 PM
Markulous's Avatar
Markulous Markulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peak District
Posts: 579
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by donoreo View Post
I still cannot see anything, but this could be the case. There is a school of thought to always "expose to the right", referring to the histogram, as it works better (less noise) to darken a photo than it does to lighten one.
Yup, sensitivity is better at the lighter "end" of the sensor - downside is that burned highlights are unrecoverable!
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-01-12, 08:27 PM
donoreo's Avatar
donoreo donoreo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,646
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markulous View Post
Yup, sensitivity is better at the lighter "end" of the sensor - downside is that burned highlights are unrecoverable!
It is a delicate balance.
__________________
My Flickr gallery
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump