Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM vs. Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DC HSM

[polarmagnus]

I'm looking to get a wide angle lens. I've been looking at reviews and have come up with these two lenses.

Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DC HSM (hood fixed!)

I think the top Sigma might be a better option because you can't attach any filter to the other because of the fixed hood.
What does everyone else think?

Also what are the Pro's and Con's of a wide angle lens?

I use my 18-55mm kit lens (on the Canon 450D) all the time when shooting landscapes but I think its about time I looked for a better lens and upgraded. I also use this lens for macro.

[silversnapper1]

Don't know anything about the 8-16mm but I do have the 10-20 and absolutely love it. It spends more time on my camera than any other lens.

What I would say though is that I have seen push on filter holders which may fit the other lens if you feel that you really have to go that wide.

edit.

Just had a quick look on WE and found this note in the additional information:-

Note:This lens comes with an adapter ring that slides over the fixed lens hood and allows the fitting of a 72mm filter.

So you should be able to get something to fit but I don't know the implications for vignetting.

[polarmagnus]

I keep reading that the lens is 'perfect' for APS-C sensors. Would it be ok for 450D's MP-CMOS sensor?

I'm seriously thinking about this lens now after reading some reviews and seeing some photos.

[silversnapper1]

The 450D has an aps-c sensor so you should be ok.

[polarmagnus]

Are you sure it has a C-MOS sensor? Because both Amazon and Canon website says it has the other one!!!

[silversnapper1]

I looked HERE.

[polarmagnus]

I notice it has links to both types of sensor. It can't have both *puzzled*

[greenwing]

Originally Posted by polarmagnus

I notice it has links to both types of sensor. It can't have both *puzzled*

I hate to say it, but yes, it does have both. APS-C is the size, CMOS is the type. It's the size that's relevant to this thread...

Chris

[polarmagnus]

Ok. Thanks for clearing it up.

So back to my question

"I'm looking to get a wide angle lens. I've been looking at reviews and have come up with these two lenses.

Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DC HSM (hood fixed!)

I think the top Sigma might be a better option because you can't attach any filter to the other because of the fixed hood.
What does everyone else think?

Also what are the Pro's and Con's of a wide angle lens?

I use my 18-55mm kit lens (on the Canon 450D) all the time when shooting landscapes but I think its about time I looked for a better lens and upgraded. I also use this lens for macro. "

[Markulous]

Originally Posted by polarmagnus

Also what are the Pro's and Con's of a wide angle lens?

I use my 18-55mm kit lens (on the Canon 450D) all the time when shooting landscapes but I think its about time I looked for a better lens and upgraded. I also use this lens for macro.

Sorry, if you don't know what WA will give you, why are you looking to purchase? One thing it won't give you is macro!

I use the 10-20mm and, of the two, would recommend that as more suitable - especially if you're unsure as to what WA brings to your photography!

I'm actually looking into getting the 8-16mm as OH's always pestering me for the 10-20mm and this way we can each have a wide