PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Magazine Forums > PhotoPlus Magazine

PhotoPlus Magazine Exclusive forum for the magazine dedicated to the Canon EOS system

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 22-07-11, 01:54 AM
gtirman gtirman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Image quality article June 2011 issue

On page 64 i read the following....."When you have an image opened in PS, you have two choices of color depth....8 bits or 16. The larger your color depth the better the quality of your image.
If you shoot RAW [i do ], you'll keep the higher quality by editing images in 16 bits."

The above makes obvious sense however i once did it in 16 bit and the printers [high and low streets ] could not print them full stop. All of the places i tried could only print in 8 bit....which seems to defeat the purpose....or am i missing something??


Any tips welcome :}
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-07-11, 11:14 AM
Stargate 01's Avatar
Stargate 01 Stargate 01 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glengormley Northern Ireland
Posts: 74
Hi gtirman, as far as I know the reason for working on yur photo in 16 bits is ot only to give you better but also it gives you alot bigger tonal range. You are also right in saying that your printer will not print them while in 16 bit as the tonal range is too much for the printer to handle, this is also true when viewing the photo on your monitor as it is only able to see so much of the colour spectrum. The reason for working on in 16 bit is to get more of the colour spectrum in it and then you need to convert it to 8 bit to either print it or view it.

I hopr this makes sense cause it's so hard trying to put it into words when it's in my head it makes sense and when Itry to explain what I want to say sometimes it just doesn't sound right.

Tony
__________________
Tony




Never eat yellow snow
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-07-11, 03:53 PM
MattUK's Avatar
MattUK MattUK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Horsham, West Sussex
Posts: 1,342
The principle is to keep all of your master images as high quality as possible. You can always reduce quality (down to 8-bits for JPG or print), but can never increase it.
__________________
Matt

View my gallery

500px
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-07-11, 02:57 AM
gtirman gtirman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Sooo.....let me get this straight !! If i still work in 16 bit in PS then convert it to 8 bit PSD/Jpeg i will still get better color quality than working in 8 bit and converting to PSD/jPEG in 8 bit.?
Hope that makes sense....:}
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-07-11, 05:58 AM
Jeff Morgan's Avatar
Jeff Morgan Jeff Morgan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 20
Yes, correct.
If you do the workflow in 8 bits each time you make an adjustment there is compromise, some data is lost (less than 256 smooth levels per channel left). Eventually you have posterization!
It is best to do the workflow and saving your master file in 16 bits (.psd best or .tif), then when you wish to print or www it then make copy to .jpg (fill the 8 bit file full, 256 (smooth) levels per channel).
Taken some liberty with explanation ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-11, 11:58 AM
gtirman gtirman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Thanx all for your great tips.....16 bits it is then !!! :}
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump