PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Photography Technique > Photoshop technique

Photoshop technique An exclusive forum for users of Elements, Lightroom and CS.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 24-02-11, 12:37 PM
pburness's Avatar
pburness pburness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Warrington, North West England
Posts: 726
Bibble

Anybody using Bibble? Can you provide any feedback on it's performance / capability?

Thanks
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-02-11, 01:32 PM
HinFrance's Avatar
HinFrance HinFrance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 855
I ran a couple of trials and the beta of Bibble5. Runs like lightning compared to LR, but it is different. LR is a good organiser, has really good NR built into it, but as a RAW editor is slower, and lacks layers. I prefer the output from Bibble too, seems crisper somehow.

In the end I went for DxO, mainly because of price, the almost one click processing and the dozens of camera body emulations built in. I have to use Picasa as an organiser, because DxO is only a RAW editor. And it's not exactly fast, but I like what comes out of the end.

Why don't you try them all, one at a time, and see what you think?
__________________
My Flickr
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." H L Mencken
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-02-11, 04:58 PM
pburness's Avatar
pburness pburness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Warrington, North West England
Posts: 726
I might.
I've used Lightroom for a long time but V3.x is just a dog on my machine (and it's echoed across the forums, so it's not just my setup). Even Adobe are asking for feedback on what we may think the problem is, so confidence in a quick fix for it.
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-02-11, 06:04 PM
Cathus's Avatar
Cathus Cathus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Herts
Posts: 1,501
Images: 22
hmm, can't say I've noticed a problem with LR 3.

I did try Bibble very quickly last year, but I preferred LR for all the extra features.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-02-11, 07:27 PM
HinFrance's Avatar
HinFrance HinFrance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathus View Post
hmm, can't say I've noticed a problem with LR 3.

I did try Bibble very quickly last year, but I preferred LR for all the extra features.
I guess it depends what you want to use it for. LR does organising really well, and there seems to be loads of stuff bolted onto the end I'd never use. Printing, for example. I am used to Qimage, so I use that.

As a RAW editor Bibble is much more flexible and much much much faster to use - I don't know why, for instance, other apps don't have the tabbed edit modules. And in Bibble the 'oranize' and 'develop' modules, to use LR parlance, are all on the same page - there's no waiting for it switch from one mode to another. LR doesn't have layers like Bibble, but does have some other features missing from Bibble.

LR is a much more complete package for sure, but it is slow(er). Horses for courses and all that.
__________________
My Flickr
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." H L Mencken
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-02-11, 07:40 PM
pburness's Avatar
pburness pburness is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Warrington, North West England
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathus View Post
hmm, can't say I've noticed a problem with LR 3.

I did try Bibble very quickly last year, but I preferred LR for all the extra features.
I've had trouble with LR3 since upgrading from LR2.7 - I've even removed everything photoshop and re-installed everything but still the sluggish response, screen flicker and occassional crashes. My machine is well above the basic spec for lightroom and CS5, and I don't run much other stuff on it.

It's a real pain - at first Adobe blamed my machine, but more and more people are seeing the same issues and they are now taking it serious, but I don't see a solution in the short term

Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump