The Tamron 90 and Sigm 105 are the main contenders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jediboy
The only real criticism is that the auto focus is clumsy
|
Do you mean the AF/MF clutch and swtich system?
The Tamron wins this hands down to me. Both lenses have a system where you push or pull the focus ring to switch between autofocus and manual but the Sigma as has a normal switch which just confuses the whole thing. If you pull the focus ring back towards you, you disengage the AF system but you ahve to also set the switch to get everything to work properly.
Also, macro lenses always have slow and long AF - it's part of the lens design as the focusing system has to have a lot of travel and tends to be slow unless you invest in a "USM" lens (for which you'd need to buy Canon).
But,
Overall, the Tamron controls flare better than the Sigma and the AF is slightly more accurate in testing. It's got irt's more normal AF switch (which is something I'd definitely prefer) but the Sigma is reported to be slightly better built. It's a tough one, but on balance I'd have the Tamron (he says still saving for the new Sigma 105mm OS!).