PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > General Chat > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Any questions, comments and thoughts about photography in general.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 15-06-10, 12:48 PM
chris-p's Avatar
chris-p chris-p is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 2,455
Images: 21
Lomography Spinner 360

I think this is brilliant.

The Lomography Spinner-360 is a plastic rotating 360 degree panoramic camera which shoots on (apparently) any 35mm film.

It works by rotating the camera on it's handle and the film is exposed through a slit. The film is advanced as the camera moves so it's completely sync'd. You get 8 panoramas off a 36 exposure roll, it's completely manual and is driven by a rubber band (good old Lomo!).

They cost from €125 and can be bought at the Lomo Store

You get some pretty interesting shots from this thing...



__________________
Chris



~ Twitter ~ Facebook ~ 500px ~
~~ Photography Tutorials ~~
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-06-10, 01:31 PM
Amy Davies's Avatar
Amy Davies Amy Davies is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bath/Cardiff
Posts: 1,040
Images: 3
Hi Chris,

I love the look of this too, you can see some more pics taken with it (and of the cam itself) on our news story from the other day:

http://www.photoradar.com/news/story...rom-lomography

You going to get one?

Amy
__________________
Amy Davies
News Reporter, Cameras@TechRadar
amy.davies@futurenet.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-06-10, 01:54 PM
GeoffWessex's Avatar
GeoffWessex GeoffWessex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,288
Images: 4
I'm a bit baffled (and skeptical) that the exposed image runs over the sprocket holes - I've never seen that in any film camera - the sprocket holes fit over, er, the sprockets of the winding mechanism..... and they're not visible through a lens - and therefore don't get exposed. Now, if this is just a bit of post-processing, fair enough.... but otherwise I can't see it happening.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-06-10, 02:35 PM
chris-p's Avatar
chris-p chris-p is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 2,455
Images: 21
Hi Amy,

Sorry. I'd missed the PR article on it! If I had a spare hundred or so quid, I'd consider one... I might have a go at trying to make something similar myself!

Geoff, it is unusual but I don't see a problem with it?
__________________
Chris



~ Twitter ~ Facebook ~ 500px ~
~~ Photography Tutorials ~~
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-06-10, 02:48 PM
ap4a's Avatar
ap4a ap4a is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffWessex View Post
I'm a bit baffled (and skeptical) that the exposed image runs over the sprocket holes - I've never seen that in any film camera - the sprocket holes fit over, er, the sprockets of the winding mechanism..... and they're not visible through a lens - and therefore don't get exposed. Now, if this is just a bit of post-processing, fair enough.... but otherwise I can't see it happening.
Browse through the Lomo Society's website and you'll see plenty of examples of where the sprocket holes do get exposed.

The Diana camera has a 35mm back which allows this effect. There are 35mm adaptors for 120 Holgas that do the same. The Lubitel 166+ does it without an adapter IIRC. And the Spinner has also been designed to do it.
__________________
500px | last.fm | twitter | G+
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-06-10, 03:04 PM
Amy Davies's Avatar
Amy Davies Amy Davies is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bath/Cardiff
Posts: 1,040
Images: 3
Hi Chris,

Of course, no problem - you promised me you'd check in on the news page every now and then :P I'll post news like this in the forums as well in future though

I had a go on a Diana lens with Canon converter on the weekend, quite a lot of fun, this looks like fun also, but like you say if only I had some spare cash lying around!

Amy
__________________
Amy Davies
News Reporter, Cameras@TechRadar
amy.davies@futurenet.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-06-10, 04:55 AM
GeoffWessex's Avatar
GeoffWessex GeoffWessex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,288
Images: 4
@ ap4a... Thanks for the reply about the sprocket holes.... so the film isn't being obscured - or supported - by guides or sprockets as it passes in front of the light.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-06-10, 09:09 AM
ap4a's Avatar
ap4a ap4a is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffWessex View Post
@ ap4a... Thanks for the reply about the sprocket holes.... so the film isn't being obscured - or supported - by guides or sprockets as it passes in front of the light.
It's being supported, but not obscured, as the image capturing area is considerably greater than 35mm film needs (120 film is 60x60mm compared to 24x36). Have a look here: http://www.lomography.com/magazine/t...us-masterclass it shows the loading of the smaller 35mm film as well as the results.
__________________
500px | last.fm | twitter | G+

Last edited by ap4a; 16-06-10 at 09:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-06-10, 04:56 PM
GeoffWessex's Avatar
GeoffWessex GeoffWessex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,288
Images: 4
Ah - I see what you mean now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump