Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue Allen
No - never mentioned the Nikon 70-200 as the budget was £600 and would'nt stretch to one of those - I was referring to the Tamron 70-200 which has lovely optics and is reasonably light but very slow AF in the Nikon version. Swapped mine for a Sigma which has nice fast AF and good quality for those who can't afford the Nikon. If the lens is going to be used as a 'walkaround' then the Nikon 70-300 has many advantages in terms of weight.
|
Sorry Sue, just read it as talking about 70-200mm F2.8 in general rather than the Tamron version which you were talking about.
12-05-10, 08:23 PM
