PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > General Chat > Pro lounge

Pro lounge Discuss issues relating to getting published, freelancing and earning money from your photography.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 16-10-09, 09:46 PM
shank_ali shank_ali is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
Images: 3
Microstock.. making money

Now i have been a ' happy snapper' for about 2 years now.
In those two years however i have made over $3000.
Microstock is booming.. Shutterstock and Getty/Istockphoto are the two biggest players.
Pop along and apply to be a contributors.
WARNING : All your work will be inspected at 100 %.Can you handle rejection ?
http://www.istockphoto.com/shank_ali
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-10-09, 01:33 PM
creid's Avatar
creid creid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
Is this spam perchance?? $3000 over 2 years is pretty paltry when you consider the amount of effort required to get stock photos accepted... Face it, FlickR has just passed the 4,000,000,000 upload mark, add to that CC licensing and it's just not worth the effort on behalf of client or tog unless it's something very specialised. Long gone are the days when a tog could make a living off stock..

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-09, 03:27 PM
chris-p's Avatar
chris-p chris-p is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 2,455
Images: 21
Looks like spam to me which is why it's been ignored.
__________________
Chris



~ Twitter ~ Facebook ~ 500px ~
~~ Photography Tutorials ~~
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-09, 06:20 PM
shank_ali shank_ali is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
Images: 3
I bought my first DSLR camerain MAY 2007.
I have only been shooting just over two years and a very basic understanding of Adobe.Hence the term 'happy snapper'
Istock or any other stock agent does not need it's members to advertise the site.It has over 65,000 contributors worldwide.
The post was to make aware to members that it is possable to make money on line from taking photographs.
Thats all !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-10-09, 09:01 AM
creid's Avatar
creid creid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by shank_ali View Post
I bought my first DSLR camerain MAY 2007.
I have only been shooting just over two years and a very basic understanding of Adobe.Hence the term 'happy snapper'
Istock or any other stock agent does not need it's members to advertise the site.It has over 65,000 contributors worldwide.
The post was to make aware to members that it is possable to make money on line from taking photographs.
Thats all !
My point stands then, it takes a lot of effort, tweaking etc to get micro stock accepted and frankly the return of (for us Brits) of "possibly" £1500 over 2 years is not than tempting when you weigh it up against the time and effort involved. Way back when (before everybody in the world had a DSLR), pro togs could make a comfortable living off stock (I seem to recall Bryan Peterson quoting he made $10000 from one photo of a bridge), those days have long gone I'm afraid.

Agreed that there is possibly money to be made but a lot of people have had some very frustrating experiences with stock / micro stock sites and the general consensus seems to be it's more hassle than it's worth unless you're working at it almost full time and even then the returns are minimal these days. Micro stock / stock photography is more a game of image quality / image size / DPI etc instead of actual content / artistic merit etc which kinda spoils it for some people, photography (for me) is an expression / interpretation / personal thing, not a business opportunity. I will never earn as much from my photography as I do in my day job and I'd rather it stays that way, that way I'll enjoy it more!

Regards

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-10-09, 07:11 PM
shank_ali shank_ali is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
Images: 3
Carl your taking about RM( rights managed).RF Microstock was introduced to the world by Bruce Livingston in 2002.He formed the company Istockphoto which was bought by Getty.However the company still has it's main HQ in Calgery and has a thriving community of both pro's and amateurs.
Photgraphy is indeed a passion for most and an actual job for some,but we can ALL earn some money from the pleasure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-11-09, 10:07 PM
cosmicma's Avatar
cosmicma cosmicma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 552
Images: 16
to make money from stock photo sites you literally have to upload thousands of images to achieve anything like a steady income
it's a numbers game the more you upload and have accepted the more chance of somebody buying one of your images

i had a dabble with fotolia a while back and uploaded about 30 images for the fun of it amazingly out of the 30 images 4 sold and gave me the grand sum of just over a quid i came to the conclusion then it's a numbers game

so if i uploaded 3000 photos and the same percentage rate sold i would have made something like a 100 quid or so but this is not a monthly income it total to date
like others have allready stated it not worth my time or effort for the return

how many have you uploaded to get a monthly income ??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump