PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Magazine Forums > N-Photo Magazine

N-Photo Magazine 100% Nikon, 100% Independent

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 13-02-13, 03:11 PM
outonalymm's Avatar
outonalymm outonalymm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Images: 35
Which wide-angle?

I upgraded not so long ago to the D800. At the same time I opted for the Tamron 24-70 VR zoom as my 'walk about' lens and I find it does a good job coupled with the Nikon 50mm 1.8 prime and 105mm macro.

However I'm looking for something wider for landscapes and cityscapes. Though the Nikon 14-24 f2.8 looks a spectacular performer it's size, weight, price and its inability to accept filters mitigate against it. I have therefore been looking closely at the 16-35mm f4 but have ended up confused at mixed reports.

So have been considering the 20mm D prime lens.

Does anyone have experience of either or both these lenses?

Now to throw a small spanner in the works Nikon have announced an 18-35mm non-VR lens but there are no reviews as yet
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-02-13, 04:16 PM
esdavey esdavey is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
I have recently bought a AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED lens which I like alot and being 77mm I think will accept ND filters .... not FX though !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-02-13, 05:45 PM
greenwing greenwing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 609
Images: 3
No experience of either of the 14-24 or the 20mm. There's the Sigma 12-24, too, which is half the price & 2/3 the weight of the 14-24, but is not f/2.8 if that's important to you.

Chris
__________________
raw is not an acronym. RAW is a setting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-02-13, 03:07 AM
Foolishcfo Foolishcfo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 13
I have a D800 too and love it. I bought a 17-35mm and although its more pricey than the 16-35mm it takes great pics. It also accepts filters. I use it primarily shooting underwater pics.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-02-13, 10:40 PM
changing's Avatar
changing changing is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 24
Images: 5
When I upgraded from a D300 to a D3s I had to sell my DX 10-20mm Sigma and chose to replace it with the Nikkor 16-35mm f/4. That is a perfectly good lens and I continued to use it when I changed from the D3s to a D800.

Eventually, last December, I decided to bite the bullet and splash out on a 14-24mm f/2.8 and the dedicated Lee filter kit. It really is a great lens but whether you can justify £800 (secondhand) for the lens and another £400 for the filters only you can say.

When travelling abroad and trying to keep within airline cabin baggage limits, I take my D800 with a 28-300mm lens and the 20mm f/2.8 prime. The 200mm is absolutely OK in terms of image quality but, of course, it lacks the versatility of a w/a zoom.

At the end of the day, as with everything else in this wonderful hobby of ours, it is horses for courses.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-04-13, 12:21 PM
Severums1 Severums1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
HI

I can recommend the setup.

I chose the Nikon 16-35 f/4 VR as my wide angle lens of choice, used with my D800 it gives me fast accurate focusing, its very sharp and nice and light.



Regards
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags

16-35, 18-35, 20mm, nikon, wide angle

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump