PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Cameras & Equipment Forums > Lenses

Lenses Let's talk glass - from ultra-wide to super-tele.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 24-06-12, 02:21 PM
Gaz2374 Gaz2374 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Dedicated macro lens

Hi guys I'm thinking of a dedicated lens my options are canon 100mm usm f2.8 or sigma ex dg 50mm f2.8 macro I no the canon will give me a better distance to work with and is a better lens so this might be the one but i also have a canon 50mm f1.8/tubes and upto 17x of diopters .
So question is will I get better results with the sigma over my current nifty fifty as I wouldn't want to scrimp and get the sigma for nothing better than what I can get already. And would rather save and get the 100mm canon instead if this is the case .

Thanks gaz
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-06-12, 07:35 PM
Jediboy's Avatar
Jediboy Jediboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,345
Images: 70
Have you considered the105mm Sigma?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-06-12, 08:19 PM
Gaz2374 Gaz2374 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jediboy View Post
Have you considered the105mm Sigma?
Not really looked tbh , I tell you what though I put a 55-250 canon on tubes and that did quite a bit better than the nifty 50 and I got alot further away too due to the zoom.

Last edited by Gaz2374; 24-06-12 at 08:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-06-12, 03:05 PM
cosmicma's Avatar
cosmicma cosmicma is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 553
Images: 16
to do close up macro on the cheap have you considered using your 50mm with a reversing ring ?
i believe great results can be achieved this way for not a lot of money
__________________
My Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-06-12, 03:51 PM
donoreo's Avatar
donoreo donoreo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,612
Images: 2
I have extension tubes. The cheap ones, no contacts. The downside, no aperture control. The upside, they cost $8.
__________________
My Flickr gallery
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-06-12, 01:43 PM
jet_kit's Avatar
jet_kit jet_kit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Posts: 602
Images: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicma View Post
to do close up macro on the cheap have you considered using your 50mm with a reversing ring ?
i believe great results can be achieved this way for not a lot of money
Yes, reversing rings are very cheap and will give you superb macro quality. The downside is that you will have no focus or distance control at all, the reversed lenses will focus where it wants to, and that's an end of it. Also, the aperture has to be set manually after you done all your setting up, so a tripod is essential.
Tip. Wide Angle lenses give you more magnification when reversed. Long lenses are pretty useless.
__________________
Chris

The day you think you've found perfection is the day you stop looking, then someone else will find it and move in front of you.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/55211328@N03/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-06-12, 10:52 PM
Gaz2374 Gaz2374 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Thanks guys , Iv got the cheap tubes also a reversing ring seems very hit and miss when reversed , doesn't seem as though I'm in control atall tbh although It's a start I guess
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-06-12, 01:05 PM
cosmicma's Avatar
cosmicma cosmicma is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 553
Images: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet_kit View Post
Yes, reversing rings are very cheap and will give you superb macro quality. The downside is that you will have no focus or distance control at all, the reversed lenses will focus where it wants to, and that's an end of it. Also, the aperture has to be set manually after you done all your setting up, so a tripod is essential.
Tip. Wide Angle lenses give you more magnification when reversed. Long lenses are pretty useless.
i realized using the 50mm canon lens wasn't the best option after i commented because there would be no control thanks for pointing that out as what i said was a bit miss leading
i should have said an old manual lens on a reversing ring would be a much better choice
it's one of those things on my todo list get a reversing ring and an old 28mm manual lens which can be picked up quite cheaply on the second hand market

another option which i have put a bit of thought into was using bellows with an old manual lens to try and achieve those " fly's eye " kind of shots

not really made my mind up which route to take yet
__________________
My Gallery
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump