PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Cameras & Equipment Forums > Nikon chat

Nikon chat Come here to talk Nikon SLRs, lenses, compacts and accessories.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #111  
Old 15-11-11, 07:36 PM
OldBoy's Avatar
OldBoy OldBoy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,014
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinFrance View Post
. . and you are very unlikely to get anywhere near 100,000 activations, let alone 150,000 unless you are a pro, in which case you'd have to upgrade it before you got that far. Basically, what they are saying is the shutter won't break.

There's a bloke on the Pentax forums who claims to have coming up for 250,000 activations on his K10D. He must have the picture taking equivalent of diarrhoea - I have had mine since they came out and have only managed about 20,000 activations.
I've got 129,404 shutter releases on my D3.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 25-11-11, 04:32 PM
Dorsetman Dorsetman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
These threads make me laugh. I have a D3x and a D7000 and a Pentax 645 as well as a couple of other relics.

I have been taking photos since i was 10 years old when my dad first gave me a camera. For me its not so much about the equiptment but about the end photo. I have seen so many spend £700 plus on a camera that they only use 50% of if that. Very rarely do many use the camera to the fullest extent. They simply think that by buying a more expensive camera they will get a better picture. I am not a snob, i have trained at a very high level and have various qualifications in photography but my real asset is my experience.

In the real world the D7000 is as good as any person really needs. I have shot many cameras and even items like the D3100 or Canon EOS 1100 will take a great shot if you bother to learn how to use it to its fullest. So a camera like the D7000 learned properly is magic. The reason i use more than this for my work is that i need the best possible sesnsor and resolution as many of my pictures get blown up to much larger than average sizes. This is why i have the Pentax and an old Hasselblad. The Nikon D7000 i bought for my back up as i had used one and was impressed and its compact enough to take on long hikes in the Lake District. With decent glass this will turn out some stunning pictures. The D3x is too large for this really but has been on shorter trips where i can use my Land Rover more.

I challenge those with a D3, D300, D700 to get a better picture than with a D7000.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 25-11-11, 06:53 PM
amk1977's Avatar
amk1977 amk1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 649
I agree with you that there is a notion that the best pictures come from the latest and greatest equipment. Watch any chain store commercial advertising a camera and the main selling point is always how many mega pixels it has. More mega pixels meant better photographs - or at least that's the angle pushed by the manufacturers. Tell a layman that the D3s with its 12mp sensor is about 4 times more expensive than then 16MP D7000 and they'd walk away scratching their head. I think its this type of marketing that has given people the misconception that anything but the latest technology is redundant.

Newcomers are also seemingly ignorant of the hundred plus years worth of fantastic photographs that have come before todays offerings. Give a complete novice a £5k camera and lens, and a pro a £500 camera the results will invariably be far, far superior from the professional. The most expensive doesn't automatically equate to the best photograph. At the end of the day, the camera is just a tool. It is down to the user to create something with it.

Digital SLRs today can still not come anywhere near the level resolutions of say an old 8x10" plate camera. Some of the most impressive landscapes/seascapes I've seen have come from an old plate camera. The level of detail and overall image quality were immense. This is where the technical and creative abilities of the photographer are absolutely paramount, as well as the skills needed to develop the image in a darkroom, which is another art in itself.

For the majority of photographers, I'd go so far as to say that the now lowly D40, is as good as any person really needs. In average daylight conditions with optimal ISO, you're not going to see a huge difference in image quality from a D40 to a D3 (aside from image size).

Its when you step into the realms of low light/ high ISO that having a camera with those sensor capabilities can make the difference between getting the shot you want and it being lost through motion blur, under exposure or digital noise. Don't get me wrong, the photograph is only ever as good as the photographer but, there becomes a point that the creative ability of the photographer is negated by the inability of the hardware used to capture the image.

I have the D90. Its a great camera and does everything I need it for. However, I do find the noise capabilities a limiting factor for natural light portraiture. Not so much an issue if shooting in monochrome as it can create a film grain quality. For colour shots, the noise is definitely a problem once you get above 800-1000 ISO.

Ultimately, it all depends what people want the camera for and its intended use. Landscapes, ideally you want a large resolution camera, particularly if you print the images for wall art or canvases. Likewise for work in the studio, hence your D3x and Pentax 645. If you're into natural light portraiture or concert photography, then the newer DSLR's with advanced low light capabilities are certainly the best bet. The D7000 does very well in this area, especially for an APS-C camera. If photography is your profession, then like any craftsman, you want the best tools for the job, that deliver the goods and allow you the flexibility and precision that is often required. The full frame cameras provide this.

There is definitely a tendency for overkill and purchase equipment that you will never use to its fullest. Again this comes back to the science of marketing, in convincing people THEY MUST HAVE the latest gadgets. This week I had a conversation with a friend about the latest "Dr Dre" headphones. Hyped up to be the bees knees and selling for the bargain price of a mere £280! "They're like studio quality, man! You can hear everything" I was told. I replied, "I'm sure they are and I'm sure you can but, you and 99.9% of the idiots who buy them will be listening to MP3's...... which is a compressed audio format."

As the old saying goes, a fool and his money are soon parted - although I confess I still play the lottery in the infinitesimally small chance that "it could be me". Unfortunately, the finger I seem to get pointed at me - is the middle one
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 29-11-11, 01:16 PM
grassgrower grassgrower is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Smile D7000

It's interesting that I have seen a lot of people knocking the D7000 and it might appear from this comment I'm one of them as well. I got my D7000 about a year ago and it's a great camera. It replaced my D90 and from that point of view was a brilliant purchase.

It is however always going to play second best as I believe my D300s is still an infinitely better camera, being more customisable and much more fun to use, especially in manual mode, which I use most of the time. In fact, so far as I can see I'll continue this way till the "D400" I've put my name down for turns up (if ever and subject to spec).
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 29-11-11, 01:57 PM
Dorsetman Dorsetman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by grassgrower View Post
It's interesting that I have seen a lot of people knocking the D7000 and it might appear from this comment I'm one of them as well. I got my D7000 about a year ago and it's a great camera. It replaced my D90 and from that point of view was a brilliant purchase.

It is however always going to play second best as I believe my D300s is still an infinitely better camera, being more customisable and much more fun to use, especially in manual mode, which I use most of the time. In fact, so far as I can see I'll continue this way till the "D400" I've put my name down for turns up (if ever and subject to spec).
Sorry but why do you have a D300 and D7000, there is no point to that as far as i can see??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags

nikon, reviews

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump