PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Cameras & Equipment Forums > Lenses

Lenses Let's talk glass - from ultra-wide to super-tele.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 24-07-11, 07:36 PM
kerbside's Avatar
kerbside kerbside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bristol U.K
Posts: 819
Images: 36
Mirror Lenses

Can anyone give me a heads up on mirror lenses.
I am looking for something for the odd shoots at the racetrack/drag racing and thought that this may be the way to go, looking at 500mm.
This will be used on a Canon 40d, any advise would be greatful, it is a cost thing as well.
Thanks
Jeff
__________________
Jeff

You have to be in to win but winning is not everything, it's participating that counts


MY FLUIDR

http://me078844.wix.com/rdcphotography-2012
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-07-11, 07:53 PM
OldBoy's Avatar
OldBoy OldBoy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,006
Images: 3
Not sure about Canon mirror lenses, but Nikon do a 500mm F8 and a 1000mm F11 mirror lenses. This means that 500mm F8 will only auto focus on a pro camera and the 1000mm F11 is manual focus only. No good for moving subjects and can be a nightmare to get proper focus manually.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-07-11, 07:55 PM
amk1977's Avatar
amk1977 amk1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 649
Hi Jeff,

I have the Tamron SP500 f/8 mirror lens. Optically its reasonably sharp although the bokeh on it is a bit unsightly, which is the same for all mirror lenses. As its a fixed aperture of f/8, you can only really use it on bright days, otherwise you'll end up with a slow shutter speed. Obviously you can raise your ISO up but, then you'll be causing image deterioration.

It is definitely best used on a tripod as any movement you make is massively amplified, due to the focal length. Its also manual focus too, which can be difficult to use if your subject is on the move. Not impossible but, still quite tricky.

Personally, I think you'd be better off with an AF lens, both for control over the aperture and minimizing camera shake from manual focusing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-07-11, 07:57 PM
greenwing greenwing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 611
Images: 3
You're not the first, and won't be the last, to think mirror lenses are a good thing. You'll want bright light, great handholding technique and manual focussing skill to get good shots with even the best of them. Many won't be rewarding even given those 3 factors.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-07-11, 08:17 PM
kerbside's Avatar
kerbside kerbside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bristol U.K
Posts: 819
Images: 36
Thanks for the feedback, maybe it will have to be something like the Sigma 150-500, would always be mono or tripod used anyway.
__________________
Jeff

You have to be in to win but winning is not everything, it's participating that counts


MY FLUIDR

http://me078844.wix.com/rdcphotography-2012
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-07-11, 05:31 PM
thefonz78's Avatar
thefonz78 thefonz78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 462
I've never heard of them i'll goggle it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-07-11, 03:01 PM
jet_kit's Avatar
jet_kit jet_kit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Posts: 603
Images: 32
The problems with mirror (or catadioptric) lenses doesn't stop with the speed and the bokeh (which some find fun), they also tend to be a bit soft. It depends what you're shooting. You mention the race track & drags, so I'm assuming it's cars which are very unforgiving bits of metal. They like to be shiny & crisp or they lose all their punch. I would not recommend a mirror for these.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump