Well, I think congratulations are in order. The website designer has actually run a spellchecker on the sourcecode, and found the bizarre "http://static..net" typo.
Shame the page layout is still screwed though, even after disabling adblocker and privoxy.
I'm bored, so here goes... again...
W3c validator still shows 68 coding errors. A nasty one is...
Quote:
You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).
This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error message for further information.
How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute, (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or use CSS instead of this attribute
|
That error can be found at line 14, column 26 of index.html, and is probably in every page, suggesting a rewrite of the php dealing with javascript insertions.
Still, the css on this site is shafted. Again, I'll state that the css needs a *major* rewrite! If words don't do much for movitation, then maybe figures will! The w3c css validator throws up 3 errors, only worrying error being...
But, there's also
1561 warnings for this site!
Remember "Jonathan Ryan"..? Well, before his untimely departure from this site, he found that one certain css file was bad. And yep, it's that very same css file that's has over one thousand warnings/problems in it!
So, there it is. More help has been offered. No doubt, the help will be overlooked.
A hint to the amateur website designer..:
http://validator.w3.org/ is *very* useful when developing websites, along with the css validator also on that site (
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/). Again, I suggest you also purchase a copy of "Website designing for dummies", as having problems such as this for a year isn't something to be proud of, is it?