PhotoPlus Practical Photoshop N-Photo Digital Camera World
Go Back   Digital Camera World Forum > Photography Technique > Beginner photography questions

Beginner photography questions The place those new to photography can come to get advice. No question is too trivial.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-11-10, 08:41 PM
ness.cd ness.cd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
Advice on new camera please !

Hi
I've currently got a little Nikon CoolpixS550 and I've just printed up about 250 photos dating back to the birth of my 16 month old daughter so they're quite special and even though I saved to disk after trying to do my best on contrast etc, I am seriously disappointed with the quality of a lot of them. I'm particularly disappointed with indoor shots which either seem to be drowned in a harsh flash, no matter what setting, or dim and fuzzy if no flash, again, whatever indoor setting I choose. The video is pretty naff too unless I turn on all the lights in the room and sellotape my hand to something immovable

I'm going to have another baby in March and I want better pictures of my girls as they grow up together and I feel this means getting a better camera. I'm toying with the idea of an SLR and going on a steep learning curve ! Is it worth it if I'm not producing pics as anything more than family/hobby ? Should I try to go for the best up to date compact instead ?

I'd really appreciate your views on this, I'm reading lots of reviews etc but getting a little lost. Thanks in anticipation.
Vanessa
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-10, 10:10 PM
amk1977's Avatar
amk1977 amk1977 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by ness.cd View Post
Hi
I've currently got a little Nikon CoolpixS550 and I've just printed up about 250 photos dating back to the birth of my 16 month old daughter so they're quite special and even though I saved to disk after trying to do my best on contrast etc, I am seriously disappointed with the quality of a lot of them. I'm particularly disappointed with indoor shots which either seem to be drowned in a harsh flash, no matter what setting, or dim and fuzzy if no flash, again, whatever indoor setting I choose. The video is pretty naff too unless I turn on all the lights in the room and sellotape my hand to something immovable

I'm going to have another baby in March and I want better pictures of my girls as they grow up together and I feel this means getting a better camera. I'm toying with the idea of an SLR and going on a steep learning curve ! Is it worth it if I'm not producing pics as anything more than family/hobby ? Should I try to go for the best up to date compact instead ?

I'd really appreciate your views on this, I'm reading lots of reviews etc but getting a little lost. Thanks in anticipation.
Vanessa
Hi Vanessa,

Essentially, you can't beat an SLR camera for picture quality. Although compacts have come a long way in recent years and can be very handy by being small enough to fit into a pocket or handbag, they can never really rival the optical ability of an SLR, with its interchangeable lenses. With my old Kodak Easyshare, like you I either got blurry, grainy images or over exposed ones. A lot of that can probably be attributed to my lack of knowledge with cameras back then but equally, the compact cameras definitely have their limitations.

There aren't a huge amount of pictures of my siblings and I growing up, which was a major reason I got into photography, as I wanted my nieces and nephews to have hundreds to pass onto their children and not just the out of focus or poorly lit snapshots that I used to take with my compact.

A DSLR doesn't have to be all that expensive, indeed some of the entry level cameras are only a couple of hundred quid more than an expensive compact. A lot of the latest models also have video on them too, which for some people is a very handy feature and an abomination for the purists lol. This would allow you to take decent photos as well as record things like your childrens first words, or their first steps, parties etc, etc.

There are a variety of makes and models to choose from, which offer very good value for money and excellent image quality. You may want to take a look the Nikon D3100, which is the company's latest entry level offering. It is review here.

My advice would be to look at the all the various entry level camera models (and maybe semi profressional ones) by the major manufacturers like Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sony, Olympus and Panasonic and see which ones have the features that you require. Make a note of those models that fit the bill and go to a camera shop and try them out to see what feels the best in your hand.

Once you have chosen the body you want, the next thing is to choose the lenses. The standard kit lenses are commonly in the 18-55mm focal lengths. This means that it can do wide angle shots to close portraits at the 55mm end (roughly what you see with the naked eye will be the same size looking through the camera). Personally, I'd recommend you go for something that's got a little more pulling power. My Nikon D90 came with the 18-105mm VR lens, which covers a nice range and has produced some excellent shots. The only other lens I would really stress you get, would be a 50mm f/1.8. They are capable of producing some really professional looking shots, due to their shallow depth of field, which creates the nice out of focus backgrounds.

If you have a look through my gallery you will see that virtually all the photographs of my nephews are taken on either my 18-105mm VR or 50mm f/1.8D. Unfortunately though, if you were to opt for the Nikon D3100, you would not be able to use the 50mm f/1.8D in autofocus mode, which with fast moving children is pretty much essential. You'd require the 50mm f/1.8G which has the focus motor built into the lens. The price difference is about £200 more!

My only other advice would be to take your time and fully research each camera you find suitable as there are pros and cons compared to other makes/models. Some will have features that you will probably never use, others may lack features that would be beneficial. Don't be afraid to ask questions if you don't understand any terminology or why certain features are preferable over others. Eventually (hopefully) you'll arrive at the camera that is right for you.

Hope that helps,

Aaron
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-10, 10:36 PM
chris-p's Avatar
chris-p chris-p is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 2,455
Images: 21
Hi Vanessa, welcome to the forum.

Aaron has given you some good advice regards SLRs but I think, considering your experience and the sort of use you're talking about, a bridge camera may be a better option.

They're basically like a small SLR but without the interchangeable lenses. Instead they have a lens which you can't change but with a huge zoom range. They also have all the manual controls you get with an SLR so they make for a great introduction to the world of photography without the cost of an SLR and the extra lenses. The initial outlay is similar to an entry level SLR but you get everything you need in one package.

I'd suggest looking at cameras like the Fuji HS-10, Panasonic FZ-45 or Canon Powershot SX30.
__________________
Chris



~ Twitter ~ Facebook ~ 500px ~
~~ Photography Tutorials ~~
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-10, 11:57 PM
Eyeayen's Avatar
Eyeayen Eyeayen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 273
You haven't mentioned price. What has been posted above makes sense and I guess it depends how much you want to spend and if you intend to take this any further as a hobby, If you do, I'd suggest the Digital SLR route, this is because all camera's have sensors in them to record the image, anything that isn't an SLR has a tiny tiny sensor in it, therefore the quality isn't as good.

However, if you are mainly sharing photo's over the web and just printing small prints this isn't really something you should worry about too much. If on the other hand you'd like to do some enlargements and bigger prints for family and friends then perhaps it is something to take into consideration.

Other camera's I'd suggest are Canon G11 ( soon to be replaced by G12 ) so possible bargains to be had, Nikon coolpix P7000 ( nikon's answer to canon's stunning G11 ). Or if you can wait until after christmas and want to go down the Digi SLR route the Nikon D5000 ( it's fairly basic for a newcomer and has video, but is getting a bit old now so you can probably pick up a good sale bargain.

If you can post budget allowances and if you want to go any further we can probably be more specific with where we point you. Hope that helps
__________________
If in doubt just nod and smile !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-11-10, 08:33 PM
loweswood loweswood is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
I'm also in the compact camp although I have an SLR as well. if you are not going to use a variety of lenses for creative effects then you don't really need one. Someone mentioned canon SX30, this is a bit of a beast, perhaps the SX20 might be better for you. Also, not too beautiful, but the G11/12 is a fantastic camera giving you the swivel screen also.

with a camera lie this you should be able to produce a top quality family album and carry the camera in your pocket!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-11-10, 01:33 PM
Bodhi78 Bodhi78 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
I have just bought a canon sx30is and I love it!!

HUGE zoom, great quality photos and a great camera to learn on then go for an SLR - personally I would rather have this for £320 than an entry level SLR as it just so flexible for the money -but has all the manual controls. When the time comes to get an SLR i will probably buy something rather expensive with a better knowledge of what i need from my camera and lenses-right now this camera allows me to take great family photos, wildlife shots, street photography - pretty much anything I like.

My friend who is a trained photographer messed around with it for a couple of hours and got some fantastic quality photos, far better than i am capable of getting at the moment....and he said to me you can have the best camera in the world but its about whose behind the lens, and the photos he took with my sx30 prove that 100%!

A great camera that will keep you going for ages - and the best thing about it is its GREAT FUN!! - and has hd video, which alot of SLRS do not have(i think??-sorry if they do) which is great for capturing those special moments.

Good luck with what ever you get!

Last edited by Bodhi78; 16-11-10 at 01:35 PM. Reason: sp mistakes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-11-10, 06:37 PM
Dagwood's Avatar
Dagwood Dagwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern England - a Scot in exile
Posts: 213
Hi Vanessa, Two young children? Pushchairs? Bags of spare nappies?You really don't want to be lugging a chunky great camera around - stick to a good quality compact like a Lumix TZ8 or 10 or even more convenient ( and here I have to say my son has just bought one and it's a cracker) a Lumix DMC-ZX1 ,currently £120 on Amazon and with a stunning lens and 12.1Mp and these compacts have great video features nowadays and so easy to use. Whatever you go for GOOD SHOOTING!!
Dagwood

Last edited by Dagwood; 16-11-10 at 06:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-12-10, 12:50 PM
williamsnichole williamsnichole is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
I recommed this Canon SX30IS Camera anyone who is looking for shooting great quality indoor/outdoor pictures. Here are some of the features that is 14.1 MP, 35x wide angle zoom, 720p HD video, TV, AV , Manual mode. The zoom seems to be the most reviewed feature.If you're looking for a professional quality camera, but aren't ready for DSLR pricing this is the camera to own! You won't be disappointed.

Edit - spam link removed

Last edited by chris-p; 22-01-11 at 09:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump