View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-02-13, 08:11 AM
Markulous's Avatar
Markulous Markulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peak District
Posts: 577
Have 7D - never used the 70-300 but between 2 of us have
Canon 100 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS & non-IS, 300 f/4 IS, 100-400
Sigma 150-500, 500 f/4.5

We had Canon 1.4x Extenders and got rid in favour of Kenko 1.4x. QI is as good and it fits *all* my lenses except WA. And use AF with a simple workaround

Personally, had much better shots from the 150-500 over the 100-400 (and best from the 500)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron McGill View Post
(shallow depth of field)
This suggests 70-200 f/2.8 for max flexibility (adding a 1.4x TC if required) - or something like the Sigma 500 f/4.5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron McGill View Post
Is build quality of Canon L series preferable to Sigma 400/500mm super telephoto lenses?
The 100-400 is undoubtedly a better build quality than the Sigma 150-500 - in fact it's built like a tank! Which is presumably what tipped it to 'L' status - the Sigma has better, if noisy, OS and IMHO although best used no wider than f/8 gives better results than the Canon (although latter gives an extra stop). I actually prefer the push-pull action for fast zoom change!
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
Reply With Quote