Thread: Which Macro
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 27-12-12, 10:16 AM
Markulous's Avatar
Markulous Markulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Peak District
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by StephenBatey View Post
I'm not convinced by the 1:1 aspect; and have reservations about 50-60mm as a focal length for macro lenses.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ex2qpwuul...VCDl/macro.pdf

The link is to a section from my book.
I'm fine with using 1:1 as a general guide and it definitely helps to separate from zoom lenses that are described as having "macro" (but are usually 1:2 or 1:4) - and find my MP-E 65mm superb for macro (which does 1x - 5x)!

The shorter the FL, the more likely you'll be shutting out light with the shadow cast by camera and lens, so I tend to recommend the Tamron 90 or Sigma 105 as being the best 'bang for your buck' all rounder lenses

Used a Sigma 105 for years and found it excellent, progressed to the 150 but now use the Canon 100 IS (1:1 macro as well as great portraits) and Canon MP-E 65 (1-5:1 lens but only good for macro)
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
Reply With Quote