View Single Post
  #3  
Old 16-11-09, 10:54 PM
matt wilson matt wilson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 593
In an ideal world I would have gone for the canon ef.

However I recently got the Sigma 10 to 20 .saving myself a fair sum of money.

I have yet to see a bad review of that lens .
Surprisingly even the difference of 10 versus 11 mm at the wide setting is quite dramatic .

Sigma is widely available too.

If you were thinking of it it's well built ,has whisper quiet and accurate focussing ,built in hood ,and a good padded case.

Read another review where the owner of the lens tested the newer fixed aperture version f 3.5 throughout .She liked it but came to the conclusion it was not worth upgrading.

Finally I tried the tamron and was less than impressed with it's build just felt sloppy and plasticky.I would rate the sigma as equally qell built as my canon efs lenses.
Reply With Quote