View Single Post
31-12-11, 03:29 PM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Originally Posted by
I hate to say it, but I think the galleries were actually better on the old site. For a company that produces photography magazines they seem unwilling to (they must be unwilling, I mean honestly, making such a poor photo site TWICE in a row?) do the job correctly. The only redeeming quality this time is that I think they can be fixed this time.
Someone needs a stern talking to by someone in a higher position. Doubly so if the same person is in charge (group director or whatever the title is) as was last time.
I just think the whole process is far more complicated than it used to be.
View Forum Profile
Send a private message to karenoliver
Find all posts by karenoliver