Thread: JPEG Vs RAW
View Single Post
  #26  
Old 22-10-09, 06:05 PM
chris-p's Avatar
chris-p chris-p is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sussex
Posts: 2,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by shank_ali View Post
How can my opinion be wrong.My work is viewed at 100 % and accepted and bought.Am i missing out on sales because i don't shoot in RAW.Hardly !
Now this actually illustrates my point about defensiveness. At no point did I say that your opinion is wrong. I am not criticising your work, your photographic techniques, your equipment or anything else. I'm sorry if I gave the impression of criticising your work or opinions - that was certainly not my intention.

What I said was that the statement you made was wrong.

You said "The modern DSLR.can record as much detail in a jpeg as a raw file and no-one will convince me otherwise.It's the oldest wives tale in photography".

Thats just simply not true. Dependant on the level of DCT compression the amount of data loss can go from almost nothing to over 80% but there is always some data loss. It's not a case of old wives tales, convincing people or coercion - it's just the way it is.

It is a simple fact of encoding a JPEG that you discard image data.
__________________
Chris



~ Twitter ~ Facebook ~ 500px ~
~~ Photography Tutorials ~~
Reply With Quote