|
I love to tell a story that goes with my images but if I don't think they'll stand up by themselves as an interesting image then they don't go into the story - quite why anyone would think this was philosophical I can't think!
Please could someone explain why an image has to be "self-explanatory". I've seen plenty that most definitely aren't and all the better for it! But putting an explanation to an image can add to it
__________________
If it moves then snap it. And if it doesn't move snap it twice in case it does move!
mark at Photobucket
|