|
At the moment I am just about making use of the features of my camera. However as I want to get some more lenses, predominantly a macro and a wide angle I took a look at what would be likely upgrade options for the camera in the future. I didn't want to be stuck with a lot of lenses for a Sony camera and then find out there was nothing to upgrade to later on.
So my option was either to keep investing in Sony fit lenses and move to an upgraded Sony body when my current one no longer meets my needs. Or while I only have limited equipment and lower investment cost move to another brand of camera.
Nikon and Canon seem to do better within reviews than Sony bodies, so I began to wonder. I know Sony make Nikon sensors so in theory with the same lenses in front of the sensor I assume I would get comparable quality pictures, in which case my choices would be more about lenses than bodies. I have been told there will be more better quality mid level lenses for Nikon and Canon than Sony and this began to sway me. I don't want to spend thousands of pounds on lenses, so would I benefit from the swap? Is a complex question to answer, and in reality there probably is no right answer anyhow!
|