[karenoliver]

After visiting a number of photography exhibitions lately I have been wondering about changing my whole method of taking photographs. I saw work by some famous photographers and their verticles were not perfect, some were blurry, noisey and had uneven horizons etc.. I am just wondering how important all of these things are really and if we do get too hung up on them? The shots I saw were stunning, told a story and despite there being technical errors they still got narrative across or came across as arty images. Exposure was not always perfect on some either yet you were able to look beyond it and enjoy the photograph. Or, is this because the photographers were really great at what they did and their photographs didn't have to conform to everyday photographic standards to work?

Karen