View Single Post
  #3  
Old 08-01-11, 04:02 AM
Cathus's Avatar
Cathus Cathus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Herts
Posts: 1,501
If you're going to produce reasonable quality work then I'd suggest £17 is way too low & you should look to double it at least.

Every hour you shoot will mean probably 1-2 additional hours of post production unless you're just sending the shots straight out of the camera, so the £17 an hour becomes £5.60 an hour, not a lot more than a minimum wage for a service which he'll charge much more than £17 to the clients for.

You should be able to factor in your time, equipment travel.

Don't sell yourself short.
Reply With Quote