Digital Camera World Forum

Digital Camera World Forum (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Lenses (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   50mm Prime Lens for D3100 (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9283)

peteallen84 12-08-12 01:41 PM

50mm Prime Lens for D3100
 
Hi all,

I've recently bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D3100, and I am considering getting a prime 50mm lens. I've had a look at the Nikon 50mm f1.8 D AF lensm which I've read good reviews of, but I understand this doesn't have autofocus with the D3100. As a newbie to photography I wonder, is this likely to make much difference in using the lens? Is there a better lens out there for my camera (and subsequent cameras as and when), or is this lens the best option for a newbie?

All advice and reviews would be hugely appreciated.

Cheers guys :)

Pete

markgozz 12-08-12 03:44 PM

Hi Pete the Nikon 50mm f1.8 G AF-S Lens will auto focus on the 3100 and it's compatible with FX format bodys if you upgrade in the future but you will have to extend your budget a bit from the f/1.8 D AF .
As a newbie to photography I think that auto focus is a handy advantage but not a necessity .

Mark

greenwing 12-08-12 07:42 PM

[QUOTE=peteallen84;81468]Hi all,

I've recently bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D3100, and I am considering getting a prime 50mm lens. I've had a look at the Nikon 50mm f1.8 D AF lensm which I've read good reviews of, but I understand this doesn't have autofocus with the D3100. As a newbie to photography I wonder, is this likely to make much difference in using the lens? Is there a better lens out there for my camera (and subsequent cameras as and when), or is this lens the best option for a newbie?

All advice and reviews would be hugely appreciated.

Cheers guys :)

Pete[/QUOTE]

I think the lack of AF would be a nuisance with the D3100. As Mark said, there's always the 50mm 1.8G AF-S.

But, why 50mm? Because that's what you've decided would be useful, or because people say you should? If you've decided it would be useful to you, go ahead & get it. If not, see if that's what you really need before you jump in.

Chris

peteallen84 12-08-12 11:43 PM

I think a 50mm would be useful, yeah, and I've read a lot of review on their benefits. I would like to try out lots of aspects of potography, which will obviously require different equipment, but I have to start somewhere! Other than the autofocus, are there any other major differences between the 50mm f1.8 D AF and the f1.8 G AF-S (other than about £60, of course)? Has anyone got either of these? Are you happy with it?

beatnik69 13-08-12 11:17 AM

The D is smaller and lighter than the G. I have both and get good results from each of them. You'll probably find the G more useful as it has the AF built in.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.