Infrared Photography
 

Near-infrared images straight out of the camera do not always look good and are usually not as dramatic and beautiful as normally captured images. Hence, a lot of post-processing is done to enhance these images.

___________________________________

[url=http://www.waterproofcamerareviews.net/]www.waterproofcamerareviews.net[/url]

hmm, do I smell spam?

[QUOTE=Cathus;74433]hmm, do I smell spam?[/QUOTE]

I've been waiting with bated breath for the next random announcement!

Maybe I should offer one? What about:

If you like to take handheld photographs with a slow shutterspeed most photos will come out blurred because most people do not have a very steady hand when they have to hold a camera very still for a prolonged period of time.

Should we continue this thread with random (but true) things? Could be fun!

If you take lots of images you could run out of battery power .

Who's up next .

Mark

I'm game:

A subject that's more than 500m away from the car is just not photogenic

If you're in a camera club and don't win any competitions, it's because your camera isn't very good.

(sorry, deviated a little from Reinardina's intention)

Photographs taken with the lens cap on generally do not look good, hence most people take them off.

"No photographer is as good as the simplest camera"
Edward Steichen.

[B]AV Aperture Priority AE[/B]
In this mode in which a photographer can choose the desired
aperture and the camera automatically chooses the shutter
speed. [U][B]A large aperture (small f number) decreases the depth
of field. A small aperture (high f number) will give a better
depth of field (see depth of field).[/B][/U]

Quoted from an A-Z of Photography published in a magazine a while back. Some of the most laughable definitions, which I'll be happy to quote if this thread continues.
Chris

Couldn't find where to put the film in my DSLR camera? :p