![]() |
Amazing baby portraits
These are brilliant...
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212179/Sweet-dreams-Newborns-sleeping-beauties-photographers-adorable-baby-pictures.html[/url] |
Hi Ben, I have to disagree, I think they're really odd. While they are technically good the poses and situations the infants are in is so unnatural that it boarders on the disturbing.
Cheers,Ben |
I disagree. I really like the unusual poses. It's not that different to the Anne Geddes stuff that you see plastered all over Clintons!
|
Fair point, I don't like the Anne Geddes baby images either - so I guess that figures. The other thing which I find a bit odd for 'portrait' is the fact that the eyes are shut in all the shots. IMHO, BB
|
I can't stand the Anne Geddes stuff - this is different enough, and not so cutesy.
I get your point about the closed eyes though. It's unusual and slightly - well odd is probably the best word - but I quite like it because of that. |
I like them too - sure they need supplementing with some wide eyed baby shots that we all love but in themselves they`d be a great addition to any parents album.
|
It's perfectly natural to stick a baby into a sack, how else do you think the stork delivers them anyway? ;)
|
[quote=ap4a;3205]It's perfectly natural to stick a baby into a sack, how else do you think the stork delivers them anyway? ;)[/quote]
The stork can't use a sack - babies take about 2 weeks to solidfy once they've arrived and if you stuck them in a sack they would leack out. :p |
I like em! Different strokes for different folks I guess...
|
[QUOTE=BenBirchall;3232]I like em! Different strokes for different folks I guess...[/QUOTE]
Ditto, and they look content enough to me too. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.