Digital Camera World Forum

Digital Camera World Forum (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Canon chat (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Diffractive optics (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=484)

Robster 09-09-09 11:07 AM

Diffractive optics
 
Hi All,
Can somebody please help me out here! because the two shops I have asked cant.
The Canon 70-300mm Diffracive Optics EF Lens does this use the same quality of optics as the L lens range or does it not have UD glass for chromatic aberration.

Or are we just parting with a lot of cash for compactness and the use of this DO optic.

Thanks

Robster
:confused:

ap4a 09-09-09 12:10 PM

There's no mention of UD elements here: [url]http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/report/200405/report.html#t8[/url]

Nor in this review: [url]http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-300mm-f-4.5-5.6-DO-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx[/url]

flake 09-09-09 08:59 PM

[QUOTE=Robster;3002]Hi All,
Can somebody please help me out here! because the two shops I have asked cant.
The Canon 70-300mm Diffracive Optics EF Lens does this use the same quality of optics as the L lens range or does it not have UD glass for chromatic aberration.

Or are we just parting with a lot of cash for compactness and the use of this DO optic.

Thanks

Robster
:confused:[/QUOTE]

There's more to an L lens than the glass inside it! The build quality of the DO optics is about the same as the 'gold band' lenses - perfectly good but not in the same class as the L

There appears to be an issue with DO lenses regularly reported on Fredmiranda, and that is contrast in anything less than good light, added to the very high cost (£850) for a lens which has the same aperture as the £89.00 Sigma version. It's also more than double the cost of the equivalent Canon version. I've never seen one outside of a shop so I don't think they've been a success sales wise, it's unlikely you would see a decent return if you need to sell it on.

As an alternative you might consider the Sigma 100 - 300mm f/4 which is reportedly a superb optic and it's faster than the Canon too. You can pick them up on eBay at a reasonable cost.

Robster 10-09-09 03:47 PM

Hi Flake & ap4a

Thanks for the info it has been most helpfull, with regards to Sigma I have also been told (how true I dont know) that like TVs there are only a handfull of lens manufacturers and that canon use them to produce there top end lenses?
any thoughts.

Robster

flake 11-09-09 08:23 AM

Erm I don't know who's told you that but it's not right! Canon certainly produce their own lenses and there is a video [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkWsk9rXpcU"]here[/URL] which shows the Canon lens production facility and follows a high end lens in its construction.

Canon don't even give the details of the auto focus algorythms to third party manufacturers, they have to reverse engineer them, which gives some people concerns over the efficiency and long term compatability.

Certainly optically it is possible for third parties to produce lenses which are every bit as good as the Canon own brand lenses.

Chris George 16-09-09 10:54 PM

[QUOTE=Robster;3118]Hi Flake & ap4a

Thanks for the info it has been most helpfull, with regards to Sigma I have also been told (how true I dont know) that like TVs there are only a handfull of lens manufacturers and that canon use them to produce there top end lenses?
any thoughts.

Robster[/QUOTE]

It is true there are only a handful of lens manufacturers - but Canon is one of them!


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.