Digital Camera World Forum

Digital Camera World Forum (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Lighting (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Studio lighting (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2815)

kfw03 20-08-10 06:44 PM

Studio lighting
 
Hello, newbie here. just set up a studio by clearing and converting my garage. Its 5.5 m x 6.0 m and I bought an elinchroms Bxri 500 kit with softboxes for main/fill plus I have SB800's for backlights, hairlights etc. Just been taking a few shots of the family but couldn't get f stop lower than f8, even on lowest power setting and with lights positioned about 4 m away from subject. (ISO 200, 1/125 sec). Are the lights too powerful for studio or am I missing something? I suppose I could move them back a bit further but everything I've read so far says to get the softest light position as close as poss to subject! There's no way I can open up the apeture to blur the background with the strobes any closer, any advice most welcome please!:confused:

gbkirk 21-08-10 07:46 PM

You can get gels(gray plastic sheets) to put over the softboxes to lower the lights in stops.

Graham

GeoffWessex 22-08-10 12:20 AM

If you shot at ISO 100 that's an immediate change to f/5.6 - I take it you're shooting at 1/125th for the sync, but most cameras are capable of 1/250th for sync (worth checking anyway) and that would 'give' you another stop to f/4.
Other than that, I think you're into the gels situation, as [B]gbkirk[/B] says.

kfw03 22-08-10 08:07 AM

Studio lighting
 
Thanks for advice, guys. I 've got some nd filters that I could also use but I don't know how it will affect a white background,so I'll have to experiment.
Yes Geoff I was using 1/125 to stay well within sync speed so I could go with a higher shutter speed to get 1 more stop. Again I'll have a play around with settings and see what I get. One more point - I moved the strobe against the back wall (approx 5 metres from backdrop) and metered it. Result: f5.6 against backdrop; f7.1 aprox 12" from backdrop and f8 about 18-24" fron backdrop. I'm sort of familiar with inverse square law, but I didn't think there would be so much variation in light levels over such a relatively small distance, another reason to get the lights up close! Thanks again.

GeoffWessex 22-08-10 01:50 PM

The ND filter idea could work - and it [I]shouldn't[/I] affect the white..... however, some filters (notably Cokin) do give a colour cast. Of course, if shooting Raw you could easily get the white back, but doing that to all the shots in each and every session is going to be a hassle. (Even though Lightroom or Aperture can do large batches). Best to find another way.

PaulMontgomery 23-08-10 06:01 PM

Surely changing the shutter speed won't have an impact unless there's a lot of ambient light in the mix?

GeoffWessex 24-08-10 02:39 AM

Changing the shutter speed could put it out of sync with the flash - you still need a sync-speed, usually 1/125th or 1/250th.

kfw03 24-08-10 08:28 AM

You're right Paul, the strobe is firing at around 1/1500 sec so it doesn't affect the exposure as the ambient is totally overpowered by the flash (even at it's lowest setting). I've just tried it at 1/250 and 1/320 on my D300 and the f stop remains constant. I want to shoot some portraits close up focussing on the eyes but can't open the apeture wide enough I need at least f2.8 but can't get nowhere near it with this set up.Guess I'll have to keep trying and find some gels as suggested.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.